Martínez-Martínez L, Ortega M C, Suárez A I
Department of Microbiology, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1318-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1318-1321.1995.
The susceptibilities of 135 coryneform bacteria isolated from clinical samples to ampicillin (AMP), cephalothin (CR), cefoxitin (FOX), cefotaxime (CTX), erythromycin (E), ciprofloxacin (CIP), tetracycline (TE), amikacin (AK), vancomycin (VA), and rifampin (R) were determined by disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and the E-test. The following species (number of isolates in parentheses) were included: Corynebacterium urealyticum (30), Corynebacterium minutissimum (20), coryneform CDC group ANF-1 (20), Corynebacterium striatum (20), Corynebacterium jeikeium (15), coryneform CDC group I2 (8), Listeria monocytogenes (7), Corynebacterium xerosis (5), and other coryneform bacteria (10). Agreement within one twofold dilution between the E-test and broth microdilution was 31% (VA), 64% (AK), 71% (CTX), 77% (FOX and CIP), 79% (TE), 84% (AMP), 87% (E), and 88% (CR and R). For the 1,350 combinations of microorganisms and antimicrobial agents, 85 (6.3%) discrepancies in interpretive category were found (4.2% minor, 1.2% major, and 0.9% very major). Seventy (5.1%) disagreements in interpretive category were found between disk diffusion and the E-test (3.8% minor, 0.4% major, and 0.9% very major), and 85 (6.3%) disagreements were found between microdilution (reference method) and disk diffusion (4.2% minor, 0.5% major, and 1.5% very major). MICs obtained with the E-test were highly reproducible. No category discrepancy was observed for VA, despite quantitative results. Considering interpretive categories, there is a good overall agreement between the three methods studied here, but further evaluation of current methodologies for susceptibility testing is required when considering coryneform bacteria and determination of quantitative activity of antimicrobial agents.
采用纸片扩散法、肉汤微量稀释法和E试验,测定了从临床样本中分离出的135株棒状杆菌对氨苄西林(AMP)、头孢噻吩(CR)、头孢西丁(FOX)、头孢噻肟(CTX)、红霉素(E)、环丙沙星(CIP)、四环素(TE)、阿米卡星(AK)、万古霉素(VA)和利福平(R)的敏感性。包括以下菌种(括号内为分离株数量):解脲棒状杆菌(30株)、极小棒状杆菌(20株)、棒状杆菌CDC组ANF - 1(20株)、纹带棒状杆菌(20株)、杰氏棒状杆菌(15株)、棒状杆菌CDC组I2(8株)、单核细胞增生李斯特菌(7株)、干燥棒状杆菌(5株)以及其他棒状杆菌(10株)。E试验与肉汤微量稀释法在一个两倍稀释度范围内的一致性为:VA为31%、AK为64%、CTX为71%、FOX和CIP为77%、TE为79%、AMP为84%、E为87%、CR和R为88%。对于1350种微生物与抗菌药物的组合,发现有85种(6.3%)在解释类别上存在差异(4.2%为轻度、1.2%为中度、0.9%为高度)。在纸片扩散法与E试验之间发现70种(5.1%)在解释类别上存在分歧(3.8%为轻度、0.4%为中度、0.9%为高度),在微量稀释法(参考方法)与纸片扩散法之间发现85种(6.3%)存在分歧(4.2%为轻度、0.5%为中度、1.5%为高度)。用E试验获得的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)具有高度可重复性。尽管有定量结果,但VA未观察到类别差异。考虑到解释类别,这里研究的三种方法总体上有较好的一致性,但在考虑棒状杆菌和抗菌药物定量活性测定时,需要对当前的药敏试验方法进行进一步评估。