Suppr超能文献

E试验与肉汤微量稀释法及纸片扩散法用于棒状杆菌药敏试验的比较。

Comparison of E-test with broth microdilution and disk diffusion for susceptibility testing of coryneform bacteria.

作者信息

Martínez-Martínez L, Ortega M C, Suárez A I

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1318-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1318-1321.1995.

Abstract

The susceptibilities of 135 coryneform bacteria isolated from clinical samples to ampicillin (AMP), cephalothin (CR), cefoxitin (FOX), cefotaxime (CTX), erythromycin (E), ciprofloxacin (CIP), tetracycline (TE), amikacin (AK), vancomycin (VA), and rifampin (R) were determined by disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and the E-test. The following species (number of isolates in parentheses) were included: Corynebacterium urealyticum (30), Corynebacterium minutissimum (20), coryneform CDC group ANF-1 (20), Corynebacterium striatum (20), Corynebacterium jeikeium (15), coryneform CDC group I2 (8), Listeria monocytogenes (7), Corynebacterium xerosis (5), and other coryneform bacteria (10). Agreement within one twofold dilution between the E-test and broth microdilution was 31% (VA), 64% (AK), 71% (CTX), 77% (FOX and CIP), 79% (TE), 84% (AMP), 87% (E), and 88% (CR and R). For the 1,350 combinations of microorganisms and antimicrobial agents, 85 (6.3%) discrepancies in interpretive category were found (4.2% minor, 1.2% major, and 0.9% very major). Seventy (5.1%) disagreements in interpretive category were found between disk diffusion and the E-test (3.8% minor, 0.4% major, and 0.9% very major), and 85 (6.3%) disagreements were found between microdilution (reference method) and disk diffusion (4.2% minor, 0.5% major, and 1.5% very major). MICs obtained with the E-test were highly reproducible. No category discrepancy was observed for VA, despite quantitative results. Considering interpretive categories, there is a good overall agreement between the three methods studied here, but further evaluation of current methodologies for susceptibility testing is required when considering coryneform bacteria and determination of quantitative activity of antimicrobial agents.

摘要

采用纸片扩散法、肉汤微量稀释法和E试验,测定了从临床样本中分离出的135株棒状杆菌对氨苄西林(AMP)、头孢噻吩(CR)、头孢西丁(FOX)、头孢噻肟(CTX)、红霉素(E)、环丙沙星(CIP)、四环素(TE)、阿米卡星(AK)、万古霉素(VA)和利福平(R)的敏感性。包括以下菌种(括号内为分离株数量):解脲棒状杆菌(30株)、极小棒状杆菌(20株)、棒状杆菌CDC组ANF - 1(20株)、纹带棒状杆菌(20株)、杰氏棒状杆菌(15株)、棒状杆菌CDC组I2(8株)、单核细胞增生李斯特菌(7株)、干燥棒状杆菌(5株)以及其他棒状杆菌(10株)。E试验与肉汤微量稀释法在一个两倍稀释度范围内的一致性为:VA为31%、AK为64%、CTX为71%、FOX和CIP为77%、TE为79%、AMP为84%、E为87%、CR和R为88%。对于1350种微生物与抗菌药物的组合,发现有85种(6.3%)在解释类别上存在差异(4.2%为轻度、1.2%为中度、0.9%为高度)。在纸片扩散法与E试验之间发现70种(5.1%)在解释类别上存在分歧(3.8%为轻度、0.4%为中度、0.9%为高度),在微量稀释法(参考方法)与纸片扩散法之间发现85种(6.3%)存在分歧(4.2%为轻度、0.5%为中度、1.5%为高度)。用E试验获得的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)具有高度可重复性。尽管有定量结果,但VA未观察到类别差异。考虑到解释类别,这里研究的三种方法总体上有较好的一致性,但在考虑棒状杆菌和抗菌药物定量活性测定时,需要对当前的药敏试验方法进行进一步评估。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluation of omadacycline activity against species.奥马环素对各物种活性的评估。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Apr 2;69(4):e0186424. doi: 10.1128/aac.01864-24. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
5
- a rare species isolated from a urine sample.- 一种从尿液样本中分离出的稀有物种。
Access Microbiol. 2021 Jan 27;3(2):000197. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000197. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Total nephrectomy following urinary tract infection.尿路感染后行全肾切除术。
JMM Case Rep. 2018 Apr 6;5(9):e005149. doi: 10.1099/jmmcr.0.005149. eCollection 2018 Sep.
9
A fatal case of urosepsis due to Corynebacterium riegelii.因里尔氏棒状杆菌导致的致命尿路脓毒血症病例。
Braz J Microbiol. 2013 Oct 30;44(2):475-6. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822013000200022. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验