Donnelly C B, Gilchrist J E, Peeler J T, Campbell J E
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Jul;32(1):21-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.1.21-27.1976.
The spiral plate count method (SPLPC) was compared with the standard plate count (SPC) method by examining 201 samples of raw and pasteurized milk. Although the means of the two methods differed significantly at alpha = 0.01,the difference was less than 10% and was not considered to be of any practical importance. The pooled replicate variances of both methods were less than 0.003, indicating good agreement between duplicate plates, with the variance of the SPLPC slightly less than that of the SPC. We believe this study indicates that the SPLPC could be substituted for the SPC in the bacteriological examination of milk.
通过检测201份生牛奶和巴氏杀菌牛奶样本,对螺旋平板计数法(SPLPC)与标准平板计数法(SPC)进行了比较。尽管在α = 0.01时,两种方法的均值存在显著差异,但差异小于10%,因此认为没有任何实际意义。两种方法的合并重复方差均小于0.003,表明重复平板之间具有良好的一致性,SPLPC的方差略小于SPC。我们认为这项研究表明,在牛奶的细菌学检测中,SPLPC可以替代SPC。