Suppr超能文献

在事故与急救科就诊的骑车者的损伤模式:头盔佩戴者与未佩戴者的比较。

Injury patterns in cyclists attending an accident and emergency department: a comparison of helmet wearers and non-wearers.

作者信息

Maimaris C, Summers C L, Browning C, Palmer C R

机构信息

Accident and Emergency Department, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge.

出版信息

BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1537-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1537.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study circumstances of bicycle accidents and nature of injuries sustained and to determine effect of safety helmets on pattern of injuries.

DESIGN

Prospective study of patients with cycle related injuries.

SETTING

Accident and emergency department of teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

1040 patients with complete data presenting to the department in one year with cycle related injuries, of whom 114 had worn cycle helmets when accident occurred.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Type of accident and nature and distribution of injuries among patients with and without safety helmets.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to type of accident or nature and distribution of injuries other than those to the head. Head injury was sustained by 4/114 (4%) of helmet wearers compared with 100/928 (11%) of non-wearers (P = 0.023). Significantly more children wore helmets (50/309 (16%)) than did adults (64/731 (9%)) (P < 0.001). The incidence of head injuries sustained in accidents involving motor vehicles (52/288 (18%)) was significantly higher than in those not involving motor vehicles (52/754 (7%)) (chi 2 = 28.9, P < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis of probability of sustaining a head injury showed that only two variables were significant: helmet use and involvement of a motor vehicle. Mutually adjusted odds ratios showed a risk factor of 2.95 (95% confidence interval 1.95 to 4.47, P < 0.0001) for accidents involving a motor vehicle and a protective factor of 3.25 (1.17 to 9.06, P = 0.024) for wearing a helmet.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest an increased risk of sustaining head injury in a bicycle accident when a motor vehicle is involved and confirm protective effect of helmet wearing for any bicycle accident.

摘要

目的

研究自行车事故情况及所受伤害的性质,并确定安全帽对伤害类型的影响。

设计

对与自行车相关伤害患者的前瞻性研究。

地点

教学医院的急诊科。

研究对象

一年内到该科室就诊的1040例有完整数据的自行车相关伤害患者,其中114例在事故发生时佩戴了自行车头盔。

主要观察指标

事故类型以及佩戴和未佩戴安全帽患者的伤害性质和分布情况。

结果

两组在事故类型、除头部以外的伤害性质和分布方面无显著差异。佩戴头盔者中有4/114(4%)头部受伤,未佩戴头盔者中有100/928(11%)头部受伤(P = 0.023)。儿童佩戴头盔的比例(50/309(16%))显著高于成人(64/731(9%))(P < 0.001)。涉及机动车的事故中头部受伤的发生率(52/288(18%))显著高于未涉及机动车的事故(52/754(7%))(χ² = 28.9,P < 0.0001)。对头部受伤概率进行的多因素逻辑回归分析表明,只有两个变量具有显著性:头盔使用情况和机动车的参与情况。相互调整后的比值比显示,涉及机动车的事故风险因素为2.95(95%置信区间1.95至4.47,P < 0.0001),佩戴头盔的保护因素为3.25(1.17至9.06,P = 0.024)。

结论

研究结果表明,涉及机动车的自行车事故中头部受伤风险增加,并证实了佩戴头盔对任何自行车事故的保护作用。

相似文献

5
Head injuries and bicycle helmet laws.头部损伤与自行车头盔法规
Accid Anal Prev. 1996 Jul;28(4):463-75. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(96)00016-4.
10
Cycling injuries and alcohol.骑自行车受伤与酒精
Injury. 2018 May;49(5):945-952. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

2
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Helmet use in bicycle trauma patients: a population-based study.自行车创伤患者使用头盔的情况:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Oct;41(5):517-21. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0471-y. Epub 2014 Nov 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验