Cho M J, Mościcki E K, Narrow W E, Rae D S, Locke B Z, Regier D A
Division of Epidemiology and Services Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20857.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1993 Aug;28(4):156-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00797317.
A concordance analysis between the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) for current major depression was conducted using data from Cuban Americans and Puerto Rican respondents to the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HHANES). Overall agreement between the two depression measures was relatively high, which suggested that the CES-D might be appropriate as a first-stage screening instrument for community-based surveys of clinical depression. Female gender and indicators of social class (education, income, poverty index, and employment) were related to low specificity and low agreement. The estimated cutoff points of the CES-D that best predicted DIS current major depression were different between the two ethnic groups; 17 for Cuban Americans, and 20 for Puerto Ricans. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the traditional method of defining CES-D cases by summing the scores for each item was superior to counting only the persistent symptoms, that is, those present nearly everyday.
利用古巴裔美国人和波多黎各裔受访者参与西班牙裔健康与营养检查调查(HHANES)的数据,对流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)和美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)诊断访谈表(DIS)针对当前重度抑郁症的一致性进行了分析。两种抑郁测量方法之间的总体一致性相对较高,这表明CES-D可能适合作为基于社区的临床抑郁症调查的第一阶段筛查工具。女性性别和社会阶层指标(教育程度、收入、贫困指数和就业情况)与低特异性和低一致性相关。在两个种族群体中,能够最佳预测DIS当前重度抑郁症的CES-D估计临界值有所不同;古巴裔美国人是17,波多黎各裔是20。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析表明,通过对每个项目的得分进行求和来定义CES-D病例的传统方法,优于仅计算持续性症状,即几乎每天都出现的症状。