Karbassi M, Khu P M, Singer D M, Chylack L T
Center for Ophthalmic Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Nov;70(11):923-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199311000-00009.
The Lens Opacities Classification Systems (LOCS III) was developed and standardized using photograding. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of LOCS III at the slitlamp and to compare slitlamp with photograding. To do so, two independent observers graded cataract at the slitlamp and in photographs from two sets of patients; the first set consisted of 205 eyes (193 acceptable photographs) and the second set of 51 eyes (51 photographs). The 95% tolerance limits (TL) for grading at the slitlamp ranged from 0.9 to 1.8 for the first set and 0.6 to 1.2 for the second (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.79 to 0.91 vs. 0.70 to 0.97, respectively). Specifically, there was a significant decrease in 95% TL for cortical and nuclear color. For the first set of photograding, the 95% TL were 0.3 to 0.6 between the two observers and 0.6 to 0.8 for the same observer at two different sessions. Similar results were found for photograding the second set. The 95% TL for comparing slitlamp and photograding were generally > 1.0. The results suggest that (1) LOCS III at the slitlamp has 95% TL only slightly worse than those for LOCS III photogradings; (2) LOCS III slitlamp grading for cortical and nuclear color improves with practice; and (3) the slitlamp and photographic gradings cannot be used interchangeably.
晶状体混浊分类系统(LOCS III)是通过照片分级法开发并标准化的。本研究的目的是评估LOCS III在裂隙灯下的有效性,并将裂隙灯检查与照片分级进行比较。为此,两名独立观察者对两组患者的裂隙灯检查结果和照片进行白内障分级;第一组包括205只眼(193张可接受的照片),第二组包括51只眼(51张照片)。第一组裂隙灯分级的95%公差范围为0.9至1.8,第二组为0.6至1.2(组内相关系数分别为0.79至0.91和0.70至0.97)。具体而言,皮质和核颜色的95%公差有显著降低。对于第一组照片分级,两名观察者之间的95%公差为0.3至0.6,同一观察者在两个不同时段的公差为0.6至0.8。第二组照片分级也得到了类似结果。比较裂隙灯检查和照片分级的95%公差一般>1.0。结果表明:(1)裂隙灯下的LOCS III的95%公差仅略逊于LOCS III照片分级;(2)裂隙灯对皮质和核颜色的分级随着实践经验的增加而改善;(3)裂隙灯检查和照片分级不能互换使用。