Schuffenecker I, Freydière A, de Montclos H, Gille Y
Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hopital de l'Antiquaille, Institut Pasteur de Lyon, France.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Apr;12(4):255-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01967255.
Four commercially available systems for identification of yeasts were evaluated using 178 clinical isolates and seven reference strains previously identified by a conventional method. After 72 h of incubation, the rate of correct identification was 86.5% with API20C Aux, 86% with Auxacolor, 68% with Mycotube and 51.1% with Candifast. When considering only the reference strains included in the manufacturers' databases, the identification rate was 90%, 91%, 87% and 61.2% respectively. Although the results at 72 h obtained with API20C Aux and Auxacolor were similar, Auxacolor led to more rapid identification of the strains, 67.9% versus 14.6% being identified at 24 h and 80.9% versus 64% being identified at 48 h.
使用178株临床分离株和7株先前通过传统方法鉴定的参考菌株,对四种市售酵母鉴定系统进行了评估。孵育72小时后,API20C Aux的正确鉴定率为86.5%,Auxacolor为86%,Mycotube为68%,Candifast为51.1%。仅考虑制造商数据库中包含的参考菌株时,鉴定率分别为90%、91%、87%和61.2%。虽然API20C Aux和Auxacolor在72小时时获得的结果相似,但Auxacolor能更快速地鉴定菌株,在24小时时分别鉴定出67.9%和14.6%,在48小时时分别鉴定出80.9%和64%。