King L A
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275-0442, USA.
J Pers. 1995 Dec;63(4):985-1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00323.x.
The purpose of this study was to compare measures of explicit and implicit motives. One hundred and one participants completed six measures of motivation, including Thematic Apperceptive stories, autobiographical memories, three wishes, personal striving lists, the Personality Research Form, and self-ratings. Stories, memories, wishes, and strivings were content-analyzed using Winter's (1989) system. Although overall correlations did emerge among explicit measures within the same motive, there were numerous correlations among methodologically similar measures of different motives. In general, explicit measures did not correlate with thematic measures of the same motives. Although correlations among measures were similar for men and women, explicit measures of power converged with thematic measures of power only for men. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors: explicit achievement, explicit affiliation, and power. Implicit achievement motivation loaded negatively on the affiliation factor. Implications for research on implicit and self-attributed motivation are discussed.
本研究的目的是比较显性动机和隐性动机的测量方法。101名参与者完成了六项动机测量,包括主题统觉故事、自传体记忆、三个愿望、个人奋斗清单、人格研究表和自我评分。故事、记忆、愿望和奋斗目标采用温特(1989年)的系统进行内容分析。尽管在同一动机的显性测量之间确实出现了总体相关性,但不同动机的方法学上相似的测量之间也存在许多相关性。一般来说,显性测量与相同动机的主题测量不相关。尽管男性和女性的测量之间的相关性相似,但只有男性的权力显性测量与权力主题测量趋同。探索性因素分析确定了三个因素:显性成就、显性归属和权力。隐性成就动机在归属因素上呈负向负荷。讨论了对隐性动机和自我归因动机研究的启示。