Conti G, Vilardi V, Rocco M, DeBlasi R A, Lappa A, Bufi M, Antonelli M, Gasparetto A
Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università La Sapienza di Roma, Policlinico Umberto I, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 1995 Oct;21(10):808-12. doi: 10.1007/BF01700963.
To evaluate the separate effects of sedation and paralysis on chest wall and respiratory system mechanics of mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.
ICU of the University "La Sapienza" Hospital, Rome.
13 critically ill patients were enrolled in this study. All were affected by disease involving both lungs and chest wall mechanics (ARDS in 4 patients, closed chest trauma without flail chest in 4 patients, cardiogenic pulmonary oedema with fluidic overload in 5 patients).
Respiratory system and chest wall mechanics were evaluated during constant flow controlled mechanical ventilation in basal conditions (i.e. with the patients under apnoic sedation) and after paralysis with pancuronium bromide. In details, we simultaneously recorded airflow, tracheal pressure, esophageal pressure and tidal volume; with the end-inspiratory and end-expiratory airway occlusion technique we could evaluate respiratory system and chest wall elastance and resistances. Lung mechanics was evaluated by subtracting chest wall from respiratory system data. All data obtained in basal conditions (with the patients sedated with thiopental or propofol) and after muscle paralysis were compared using the Student's t test for paired data. The administration of pancuronium bromide to sedated patients induced a complete muscle paralysis without producing significant modification both to the viscoelastic and to the resistive parameters of chest wall and respiratory system.
This study demonstrates the lack of additive effects of muscle paralysis in mechanically ventilated, sedated patients. Also in view of the possible side effects of muscle paralysis, our results question the usefulness of generalized administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs in mechanically ventilated patients.
评估镇静和肌松对机械通气危重症患者胸壁和呼吸系统力学的单独影响。
罗马“La Sapienza”大学医院重症监护病房。
本研究纳入了13例危重症患者。所有患者均患有累及肺和胸壁力学的疾病(4例急性呼吸窘迫综合征,4例无连枷胸的闭合性胸外伤,5例伴有液体超负荷的心源性肺水肿)。
在基础状态(即患者处于无呼吸镇静状态)下的恒流控制机械通气期间以及使用溴化潘库溴铵进行肌松后,评估呼吸系统和胸壁力学。具体而言,我们同时记录气流、气管压力、食管压力和潮气量;通过吸气末和呼气末气道阻断技术,我们可以评估呼吸系统和胸壁弹性及阻力。通过从呼吸系统数据中减去胸壁数据来评估肺力学。使用配对数据的Student's t检验比较在基础状态(患者使用硫喷妥钠或丙泊酚镇静)和肌松后获得的所有数据。对镇静患者使用溴化潘库溴铵可导致完全肌松,而对胸壁和呼吸系统的粘弹性及阻力参数均无显著改变。
本研究表明,在机械通气的镇静患者中,肌松没有叠加作用。鉴于肌松可能产生的副作用,我们的结果对在机械通气患者中普遍使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的有效性提出了质疑。