新型API念珠菌系统与ID 32C系统用于鉴定临床重要酵母菌种的比较。
Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species.
作者信息
Fricker-Hidalgo H, Vandapel O, Duchesne M A, Mazoyer M A, Monget D, Lardy B, Lebeau B, Freney J, Ambroise-Thomas P, Grillot R
机构信息
Département de Parasitologie-Mycologie Médicale et Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, France.
出版信息
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jul;34(7):1846-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.34.7.1846-1848.1996.
Abstract
API Candida was evaluated in comparison with the ID 32C system for the identification of 619 yeast isolates. The sensitivity of API Candida for the identification of the 15 species it claims to identify with and without additional tests was 97.4% (593 of 609) and 75.2% (458 of 609), respectively. The API Candida system is easy to use and rapid (result in 18 to 24 h).
摘要
将API念珠菌系统与ID 32C系统进行比较，以鉴定619株酵母分离株。API念珠菌系统对于其宣称能够鉴定的15种菌种，无论有无额外测试，鉴定的敏感性分别为97.4%（609株中的593株）和75.2%（609株中的458株）。API念珠菌系统易于使用且快速（18至24小时出结果）。
相似文献
1
Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species.新型API念珠菌系统与ID 32C系统用于鉴定临床重要酵母菌种的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jul;34(7):1846-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.34.7.1846-1848.1996.
2
Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.API 20C和ID 32C系统用于鉴定常见和罕见临床酵母分离株的效能。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Nov;36(11):3396-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.11.3396-3398.1998.
3
Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.RapID Yeast Plus系统在5小时内鉴定304种临床重要酵母菌的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 May;34(5):1069-71. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1069-1071.1996.
4
Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.三种用于鉴定临床微生物实验室中常见分离酵母的商业系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):1967-70. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1967-1970.1999.
5
Direct identification and recognition of yeast species from clinical material by using albicans ID and CHROMagar Candida plates.通过使用白色念珠菌鉴定板和CHROMagar念珠菌平板直接从临床材料中鉴定和识别酵母菌种。
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Feb;34(2):454-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.2.454-456.1996.
6
Evaluation of the new API Candida system for identification of the most clinically important yeast species.新型API念珠菌系统用于鉴定临床上最重要酵母菌种的评估。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Nov;32(3):217-21. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00119-9.
7
Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.用于鉴定临床酵母分离株的AUXACOLOR系统评估
Mycopathologia. 1997;137(3):153-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1006801616134.
8
[Comparison of Phoenix™ Yeast ID Panel and API® ID 32C commercial systems for the identification of Candida species isolated from clinical samples].[用于鉴定从临床样本中分离出的念珠菌属的Phoenix™酵母鉴定板和API® ID 32C商业系统的比较]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2014 Jul;48(3):438-48. doi: 10.5578/mb.7827.
9
Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.使用Microring YT鉴定临床酵母分离株。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Feb;31(2):185-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.185-187.1993.
10
Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.新型Vitek酵母生化鉴定卡与API 20C酵母鉴定系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1184-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1184-1187.1994.
引用本文的文献
1
COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR USUAL METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION OF Candida SPECIES.四种常见念珠菌属鉴定方法的比较
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2015 Jul-Aug;57(4):281-7. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652015000400002.
2
In vitro susceptibility of a large collection of Candida Strains against fluconazole and voriconazole by using the CLSI disk diffusion assay.采用 CLSI 纸片扩散法检测大量念珠菌对氟康唑和伏立康唑的体外药敏情况。
Mycopathologia. 2011 Jun;171(6):411-6. doi: 10.1007/s11046-010-9387-1. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
3
Spectrum and prevalence of fungi infecting deep tissues of lower-limb wounds in patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者下肢深部组织伤口感染真菌的种类与流行率。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jun;48(6):2097-102. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02035-09. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
4
Evaluation of the new Micronaut-Candida system compared to the API ID32C method for yeast identification.将新型Micronaut - 念珠菌系统与API ID32C方法用于酵母鉴定的比较评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 May;46(5):1824-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02350-07. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
5
In vitro interactions between tacrolimus and azoles against Candida albicans determined by different methods.通过不同方法测定他克莫司与唑类药物对白色念珠菌的体外相互作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Feb;52(2):409-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01070-07. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
6
Comparison of VITEK 2 with ITS2-fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species.VITEK 2与内转录间隔区2（ITS2）片段长度多态性分析在酵母菌种鉴定中的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 May;42(5):2209-11. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2209-2211.2004.
7
Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of yeasts and yeast-like organisms.评估VITEK 2系统用于快速鉴定酵母和类酵母微生物。
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 May;38(5):1782-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.5.1782-1785.2000.
8
The ins and outs of DNA fingerprinting the infectious fungi.对感染性真菌进行DNA指纹识别的来龙去脉。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Apr;13(2):332-70. doi: 10.1128/CMR.13.2.332.
9
Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.七种商业酵母鉴定系统的比较研究。
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Apr;52(4):271-3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.4.271.
10
Comparison of the API Candida system with the AUXACOLOR system for identification of common yeast pathogens.用于鉴定常见酵母病原体的API念珠菌系统与AUXACOLOR系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Mar;37(3):821-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.821-823.1999.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluation of the ATB 32 C system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 1995 Feb;1(2):134-138. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1995.tb00458.x.
2
Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.四种用于鉴定医学上重要酵母菌的商业系统的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Apr;12(4):255-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01967255.
3
Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.新型Vitek酵母生化鉴定卡与API 20C酵母鉴定系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1184-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1184-1187.1994.
4
CHROMagar Candida, a new differential isolation medium for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species.科玛嘉念珠菌显色培养基，一种用于初步鉴定临床重要念珠菌属菌种的新型鉴别分离培养基。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Aug;32(8):1923-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.8.1923-1929.1994.
5
Evaluation of the albicans IDR plate method for the rapid identification of Candida albicans.用于快速鉴定白色念珠菌的白色念珠菌IDR平板法评估。
Mycoses. 1993 Nov-Dec;36(11-12):417-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1993.tb00731.x.
6
Rapid identification of Candida albicans by using Albicans ID and fluoroplate agar plates.使用白色念珠菌鉴定试剂盒和荧光平板琼脂平板快速鉴定白色念珠菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Dec;32(12):3034-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.12.3034-3036.1994.
7
PCR identification of four medically important Candida species by using a single primer pair.使用单一引物对通过聚合酶链反应鉴定四种医学上重要的念珠菌属物种。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Dec;32(12):2962-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.12.2962-2967.1994.
8
Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.使用更新后的Vitek酵母生化鉴定卡对临床酵母分离株进行错误鉴定。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Dec;32(12):2889-92. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.12.2889-2892.1994.
9
Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1994;52(6):443-6.
10
Importance of Candida species other than C. albicans as pathogens in oncology patients.除白色念珠菌外的念珠菌属作为肿瘤患者病原体的重要性。
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jan;20(1):115-25. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.1.115.
Zotero 插件