用于鉴定常见酵母病原体的API念珠菌系统与AUXACOLOR系统的比较。
Comparison of the API Candida system with the AUXACOLOR system for identification of common yeast pathogens.
作者信息
Campbell C K, Davey K G, Holmes A D, Szekely A, Warnock D W
机构信息
Mycology Reference Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Bristol, United Kingdom.
出版信息
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Mar;37(3):821-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.821-823.1999.
Abstract
Two commercial systems for the identification of yeasts were evaluated by using 159 clinical isolates that had also been identified by conventional biochemical and morphological methods. The API Candida system correctly identified 146 isolates (91.8%), and the AUXACOLOR system correctly identified 145 isolates (91.2%). However, of the 146 isolates identified by the API Candida system, 23 required supplemental biochemical tests or morphological assessment to obtain the correct identification. The AUXACOLOR system gave no identification in 13 cases (8.2%), while the API Candida system gave an unreadable profile in only one case. Incorrect identifications were more common with the API Candida system (12 isolates; 7.5%) than with the AUXACOLOR system (1 isolate; 0.6%).
摘要
使用159株临床分离株对两种用于酵母菌鉴定的商业系统进行了评估，这些分离株也已通过传统生化和形态学方法进行了鉴定。API念珠菌系统正确鉴定了146株分离株（91.8%），AUXACOLOR系统正确鉴定了145株分离株（91.2%）。然而，在API念珠菌系统鉴定出的146株分离株中，有23株需要补充生化试验或形态学评估才能获得正确鉴定。AUXACOLOR系统在13例（8.2%）中未给出鉴定结果，而API念珠菌系统仅在1例中给出了无法读取的结果。API念珠菌系统的错误鉴定（12株分离株；7.5%）比AUXACOLOR系统（1株分离株；0.6%）更常见。
相似文献
1
Comparison of the API Candida system with the AUXACOLOR system for identification of common yeast pathogens.用于鉴定常见酵母病原体的API念珠菌系统与AUXACOLOR系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Mar;37(3):821-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.821-823.1999.
2
Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.用于鉴定临床酵母分离株的AUXACOLOR系统评估
Mycopathologia. 1997;137(3):153-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1006801616134.
3
Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.七种商业酵母鉴定系统的比较研究。
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Apr;52(4):271-3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.4.271.
4
Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.AUXACOLOR系统评估：一种新型临床酵母菌鉴定方法
J Clin Pathol. 1995 Sep;48(9):807-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.9.807.
5
Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.雅培量子II型酵母鉴定系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Sep;22(3):442-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.3.442-444.1985.
6
Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.三种用于鉴定临床微生物实验室中常见分离酵母的商业系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):1967-70. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1967-1970.1999.
7
Variation in Microbial Identification System accuracy for yeast identification depending on commercial source of Sabouraud dextrose agar.根据沙氏葡萄糖琼脂的商业来源，微生物鉴定系统对酵母鉴定的准确性存在差异。
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):2080-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.6.2080-2083.1999.
8
Are the Conventional Commercial Yeast Identification Methods Still Helpful in the Era of New Clinical Microbiology Diagnostics? A Meta-Analysis of Their Accuracy.在新的临床微生物诊断时代，传统的商业酵母鉴定方法是否仍然有用？对其准确性的荟萃分析
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Aug;53(8):2439-50. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00802-15. Epub 2015 May 20.
9
[Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].[微生物实验室中用于鉴定酵母分离株的常见商业系统评估：一项多中心研究]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2015 Apr;49(2):210-20. doi: 10.5578/mb.9370.
10
Comparison of Auxacolor with API 20 C Aux in yeast identification.奥克色林与API 20 C Aux在酵母鉴定中的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 1997 Jun;3(3):369-375. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1997.tb00628.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Magnetic Nanobead Paper-Based Biosensors for Colorimetric Detection of .用于比色检测的基于磁性纳米珠的纸质生物传感器
ACS Omega. 2024 Oct 7;9(42):43005-43015. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c05941. eCollection 2024 Oct 22.
2
: Biology, Pathogenicity, Virulence Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment.生物学、致病性、毒力因子、诊断与治疗
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Aug 31;15:5121-5135. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S383785. eCollection 2022.
3
The Identification of Multidrug-Resistant Microorganisms including Acquired from the Skin/Prosthetic Interface of Amputees and Their Susceptibility to Medihoney™ and Garlic Extract (Allicin).多重耐药微生物的鉴定，包括从截肢者皮肤/假体界面获取的微生物及其对医用蜂蜜™和大蒜提取物（蒜素）的敏感性。
Microorganisms. 2022 Jan 26;10(2):299. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020299.
4
Advances in Candida detection platforms for clinical and point-of-care applications.用于临床和即时护理应用的念珠菌检测平台的进展。
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017 Jun;37(4):441-458. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2016.1167667. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
Metal-Induced Production of a Novel Bioadsorbent Exopolysaccharide in a Native Rhodotorula mucilaginosa from the Mexican Northeastern Region.金属诱导墨西哥东北地区天然粘红酵母产生一种新型生物吸附性胞外多糖。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 1;11(2):e0148430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148430. eCollection 2016.
6
Are the Conventional Commercial Yeast Identification Methods Still Helpful in the Era of New Clinical Microbiology Diagnostics? A Meta-Analysis of Their Accuracy.在新的临床微生物诊断时代，传统的商业酵母鉴定方法是否仍然有用？对其准确性的荟萃分析
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Aug;53(8):2439-50. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00802-15. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
Identification, typing, antifungal resistance profile, and biofilm formation of Candida albicans isolates from Lebanese hospital patients.黎巴嫩医院患者白色念珠菌分离株的鉴定、分型、抗真菌药敏谱及生物膜形成
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:931372. doi: 10.1155/2014/931372. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
8
Epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility, and pathogenicity of Candida africana isolates from the United Kingdom.英国分离的非洲假丝酵母菌的流行病学、抗真菌药敏性和致病性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):967-72. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02816-12. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
9
Assessment of accuracy of identification of pathogenic yeasts in microbiology laboratories in the United kingdom.英国微生物实验室中致病性酵母菌鉴定准确性的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Aug;50(8):2639-44. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00913-12. Epub 2012 May 30.
10
Evaluation of the commercial rapid trehalose test (GLABRATA RTT) for the point of isolation identification of Candida glabrata isolates in primary cultures.评价商用快速海藻糖试验（GLABRATA RTT）在原发性培养物中分离鉴定近平滑念珠菌的应用。
Mycopathologia. 2012 Apr;173(4):259-64. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9508-5. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparison of Auxacolor with API 20 C Aux in yeast identification.奥克色林与API 20 C Aux在酵母鉴定中的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 1997 Jun;3(3):369-375. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1997.tb00628.x.
2
Evaluation of six commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.六种用于鉴定医学重要酵母菌的商业系统的评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;17(7):479-88. doi: 10.1007/BF01691130.
3
Comparison of the rapid yeast plus panel with the API20C yeast system for identification of clinically significant isolates of Candida species.快速酵母组合鉴定板与API20C酵母系统用于鉴定念珠菌属临床重要分离株的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 May;36(5):1443-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.5.1443-1445.1998.
4
Comparison of RapID yeast plus system with API 20C system for identification of common, new, and emerging yeast pathogens.RapID酵母加系统与API 20C系统用于鉴定常见、新型和新兴酵母病原体的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Apr;36(4):883-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.4.883-886.1998.
5
Occurrence of yeast bloodstream infections between 1987 and 1995 in five Dutch university hospitals.1987年至1995年间荷兰五所大学医院酵母血流感染的发生情况。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;15(12):909-12. doi: 10.1007/BF01690507.
6
Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species.新型API念珠菌系统与ID 32C系统用于鉴定临床重要酵母菌种的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jul;34(7):1846-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.34.7.1846-1848.1996.
7
Differentiation of yeast-like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system.
Mycoses. 1996 Mar-Apr;39(3-4):135-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1996.tb00116.x.
8
Itraconazole susceptibilities of fluconazole susceptible and resistant isolates of five Candida species.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Nov;36(5):787-93. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.5.787.
9
Fluconazole susceptibilities of Candida species and distribution of species recovered from blood cultures over a 5-year period.5年间念珠菌属对氟康唑的敏感性及从血培养中分离出的菌种分布情况。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jun;38(6):1422-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.6.1422.
10
Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.新型Vitek酵母生化鉴定卡与API 20C酵母鉴定系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1184-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1184-1187.1994.
Zotero 插件