Gaudet I D, Florence L Z, Coleman R N
Alberta Environmental Centre, Vegreville, Canada.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Nov;62(11):4032-5. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.11.4032-4035.1996.
Six test media, m-TEC, m-TEC with 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide (MUG), lauryl tryptose agar (LTA) with MUG, LTA with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-glucuronide (X-Glue), EC medium with MUG, and lauryl tryptose broth with MUG, were evaluated for their usefulness in enumerating Escherichia coli in nonpotable waters on a routine basis. The media were chosen for their case of interpretation of target colonies, ability to allow enumeration at low and high concentrations, and ability to inhibit nontarget microorganisms. The recoveries on the test media were compared with those on three reference media, R2A, m-FC, and m-Endo, by analysis of spiked samples of filter-sterilized waters. The test media were then further tested for their ability to differentiate nontarget but closely related microorganisms. Statistical analysis indicated that the best recoveries were obtained with lauryl tryptose agar with added MUG and X-Gluc. The media were then tested with surface waters that could be expected to have high levels of total and fecal coliforms along with Escherichia coli.
评估了六种测试培养基,即m-TEC、添加4-甲基伞形酮-β-D-葡萄糖醛酸苷(MUG)的m-TEC、添加MUG的月桂基色氨酸琼脂(LTA)、添加5-溴-4-氯-3-吲哚基-β-D-葡萄糖醛酸苷(X-Glue)的LTA、添加MUG的EC培养基以及添加MUG的月桂基色氨酸肉汤,以确定它们在常规检测非饮用水中大肠杆菌数量方面的实用性。选择这些培养基是基于它们对目标菌落的可解释性、在低浓度和高浓度下进行计数的能力以及抑制非目标微生物的能力。通过对过滤除菌水的加标样品进行分析,将测试培养基上的回收率与三种参考培养基(R2A、m-FC和m-Endo)上的回收率进行比较。然后进一步测试测试培养基区分非目标但密切相关微生物的能力。统计分析表明,添加MUG和X-Gluc的月桂基色氨酸琼脂的回收率最高。然后用预计含有高水平总大肠菌群、粪大肠菌群以及大肠杆菌的地表水对这些培养基进行测试。