Suppr超能文献

热湿交换器和加热湿化器对机械通气撤机试验期间通气和气体交换影响的比较。

Comparison of the effects of heat and moisture exchangers and heated humidifiers on ventilation and gas exchange during weaning trials from mechanical ventilation.

作者信息

Le Bourdellès G, Mier L, Fiquet B, Djedaïni K, Saumon G, Coste F, Dreyfuss D

机构信息

Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hopital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.

出版信息

Chest. 1996 Nov;110(5):1294-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.5.1294.

Abstract

Heat and moisture exchangers (HME) are increasingly used to warm and humidify inspired gases in intubated ventilated patients. But these devices add dead space that may alter the alveolar ventilation. This could impair the efficiency of spontaneous ventilation (SV) during weaning trials from mechanical ventilation. Fifteen patients were tested with an HME (Hygrobac-DAR) and a heated humidifier (HH) (Fischer-Paykel MR 450) in a random order during weaning trials in SV with inspiratory pressure support. Minute ventilation VE, tidal volume), and respiratory rate were recorded and arterial blood was sampled for blood gas analysis with each device. The HME gave a significantly greater VE than the HH (9.3 +/- 0.8 L/min vs 8.1 +/- 0.8 L/min; p < 0.005), because of increased respiratory rate (21 +/- 2/min vs 19 +/- 2/min; p < 0.05). Tidal volume was unchanged for HME and HH (470 +/- 32 mL vs 458 +/- 39 mL). The higher PaCO2 with HME than with HH (44 +/- 2 mm Hg vs 42 +/- 2 mm Hg; p < 0.005) revealed an insufficient alveolar ventilation response to the increase in dead space. Arterial Po2 rose with the HME, but not significantly above the HH values (103 +/- 6 mm Hg vs 97 +/- 6 mm Hg; p = 0.055), possibly because of a positive end-expiratory pressure effect of the HME. The need to increase VE in SV when an HME is used should be taken into account during difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation.

摘要

热湿交换器(HME)越来越多地用于为插管通气患者的吸入气体加温加湿。但这些装置会增加死腔,可能改变肺泡通气。这可能会损害机械通气撤机试验期间自主通气(SV)的效率。在15例接受吸气压力支持的自主通气撤机试验患者中,随机先后使用热湿交换器(Hygrobac-DAR)和加热湿化器(HH)(费雪派克MR 450)进行测试。记录每台装置使用时的分钟通气量(VE)、潮气量和呼吸频率,并采集动脉血进行血气分析。热湿交换器组的VE显著高于加热湿化器组(9.3±0.8L/分钟对8.1±0.8L/分钟;p<0.005),原因是呼吸频率增加(21±2次/分钟对19±2次/分钟;p<0.05)。热湿交换器组和加热湿化器组的潮气量无变化(470±32ml对458±39ml)。热湿交换器组的动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)高于加热湿化器组(44±2mmHg对42±2mmHg;p<0.005),表明肺泡通气对死腔增加的反应不足。使用热湿交换器时动脉血氧分压(Po2)升高,但未显著高于加热湿化器组的值(103±6mmHg对97±6mmHg;p=0.055),这可能是由于热湿交换器的呼气末正压效应。在机械通气困难撤机过程中,应考虑使用热湿交换器时自主通气中增加VE的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验