Peterson E M, Darrow V, Blanding J, Aarnaes S, de la Maza L M
Department of Pathology, University of California, Irvine, Orange 92868-3298, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):957-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.957-959.1997.
In an attempt to use an expanded "gold standard" in an evaluation of an antigen detection test for Chlamydia trachomatis, the AMPLICOR (Roche Diagnostics Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) PCR Chlamydia trachomatis test and culture were used with 591 sets of cervical specimens. Of the 591 specimens assayed, 35 were retested due to either an equivocal result by the PCR (19 samples) or a discrepancy between the results of culture, PCR, and the antigen detection method. During the repeat testing of the samples with equivocal and discrepant results, all but one interpretation change was due to the PCR result. In addition, upon repeat testing the PCR assay value measured in optical density units varied widely for 13 of these specimens. These 13 specimens were then tested in triplicate by the manufacturer with primers to the chlamydia plasmid and in duplicate with primers to the major outer membrane protein. Only 3 of the 13 specimens gave the same interpretation with these five replicates. In summary, reproducibility problems with the AMPLICOR test should be considered before it is incorporated as part of routine testing or used as an expanded gold standard for chlamydia testing.
为了在评估沙眼衣原体抗原检测试验中使用扩展的“金标准”,对591组宫颈标本同时采用了AMPLICOR(罗氏诊断系统公司,新泽西州布兰奇堡)沙眼衣原体PCR检测法和培养法。在检测的591份标本中,有35份因PCR结果不明确(19份样本)或培养、PCR及抗原检测方法结果之间存在差异而进行了重新检测。在对结果不明确和有差异的样本进行重复检测时,除一次结果变化外,所有结果变化均归因于PCR结果。此外,在对这些标本中的13份进行重复检测时,以光密度单位测量的PCR测定值差异很大。然后,制造商用针对衣原体质粒的引物对这13份标本进行了三次重复检测,并用针对主要外膜蛋白的引物进行了两次重复检测。在这五次重复检测中,13份标本中只有3份给出了相同的结果判定。总之,在将AMPLICOR检测法纳入常规检测或用作衣原体检测的扩展金标准之前,应考虑其重复性问题。