Provencher S, Labrèche F P, De Guire L
Montréal Public Health Department, Occupational and Environmental Health Unit, Québec, Canada.
Occup Environ Med. 1997 Apr;54(4):272-6. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.4.272.
To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a physician based surveillance system of occupational respiratory diseases (PROPULSE) in Québec with regard to physician participation rate, characteristics of reported cases, and comparison with official statistics from the Workers' Compensation Board (WCB).
All chest physicians and allergists in Québec were asked to report suspected new cases of occupational respiratory diseases, on a monthly basis, between October 1992 and September 1993. For each case, personal information was collected and the physician's opinion on whether the condition was related to work was categorised as highly likely, likely, and unlikely.
Of the 161 physicians initially approached, 68% participated. Physicians rated 48% of suspected cases as highly likely, 29% as likely, and 20% as unlikely. The most often reported diagnosis was asthma (63%), followed by diseases related to asbestos (16%). Silicosis was less frequent (5%) but it was reported for six workers under 40 of whom five were involved in sandblasting activities. The high proportion of cases of asthma probably reflects the increasing importance of this disease but may also reflect the different patterns of reporting among physicians with different expertise. The distribution of cases by diagnostic category is quite different between the PROPULSE system and that of the WCB (annual mean number of compensated cases during a four year period). Asthma and allergic alveolitis are more frequent in PROPULSE, reactive airways dysfunction syndrome are about the same in both systems, and other diseases are more frequent among compensated cases. The most frequent sensitising agents reported for asthma were the same in both systems (isocyanates, flour, and wood dust). 15% of the PROPULSE cases were not covered by the WCB, and therefore would not be found in the board's official statistics.
A physician based reporting procedure can be implemented as part of a surveillance system to supplement data from other sources and thus provide a better understanding of the occurrence of occupational respiratory diseases.
评估在魁北克实施基于医生的职业性呼吸系统疾病监测系统(PROPULSE)在医生参与率、报告病例特征以及与工人赔偿委员会(WCB)官方统计数据比较方面的可行性。
要求魁北克所有胸科医生和过敏症专科医生在1992年10月至1993年9月期间每月报告疑似职业性呼吸系统疾病新病例。对于每个病例,收集个人信息,并将医生关于病情是否与工作有关的意见分为极有可能、有可能和不太可能。
最初联系的161名医生中,68%参与了。医生将48%的疑似病例评为极有可能,29%为有可能,20%为不太可能。报告最多的诊断是哮喘(63%),其次是与石棉有关的疾病(16%)。矽肺较少见(5%),但报告了6名40岁以下的工人,其中5人从事喷砂活动。哮喘病例的高比例可能反映了这种疾病日益增加的重要性,但也可能反映了不同专业医生之间不同的报告模式。PROPULSE系统与WCB(四年期间补偿病例的年均数量)的诊断类别病例分布有很大不同。哮喘和过敏性肺泡炎在PROPULSE中更常见,反应性气道功能障碍综合征在两个系统中大致相同,其他疾病在补偿病例中更常见。两个系统中报告的哮喘最常见致敏剂相同(异氰酸酯、面粉和木尘)。15%的PROPULSE病例未被WCB涵盖,因此在委员会的官方统计数据中不会被发现。
基于医生的报告程序可作为监测系统的一部分实施,以补充其他来源的数据,从而更好地了解职业性呼吸系统疾病的发生情况。