Suppr超能文献

评估三种商用酶联免疫吸附测定法和两种乳胶凝集测定法用于诊断原发性爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒感染。

Evaluation of three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and two latex agglutination assays for diagnosis of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection.

作者信息

Svahn A, Magnusson M, Jägdahl L, Schloss L, Kahlmeter G, Linde A

机构信息

Clinical Microbiological Laboratory, Central Hospital, Växjö, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Nov;35(11):2728-32. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.11.2728-2732.1997.

Abstract

Three commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) from Gull, Biotest, and Behring (Enzygnost) and two latex agglutination tests for heterophile antibodies (Monolatex [Biotest] and Mono-Lex [Trinity Laboratories]) were evaluated for the diagnosis of primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and EBV seropositivity. Two hundred fourteen consecutive samples from 197 patients with symptoms of primary EBV infection were analyzed by the five assays at a clinical microbiology laboratory. The samples were also analyzed independently by immunofluorescence methods at a reference laboratory. According to the reference methods, 37 patients (40 serum samples) had primary EBV infections, 120 patients (127 serum samples) had had past EBV infections, 33 patients (36 serum samples) were seronegative, and 7 patients (11 serum samples) exhibited atypical reactions. The respective sensitivities and specificities for the diagnosis of primary EBV infection were 95 and 100% for the Gull assays, 100 and 94% for the Biotest assays, and 100 and 89%, for the Enzygnost assays. The Monolatex and Mono-Lex methods showed similar sensitivities and specificities (78 to 85% and 100 to 99%, respectively) for the diagnosis of primary EBV infection. This study demonstrates the usefulness of commercially available assays for the rapid diagnosis of primary EBV infection, but also the importance of large-scale testing of routine samples before choosing an assay.

摘要

对古尔德(Gull)、比奥泰克(Biotest)和贝林(Behring)(恩齐诺斯特[Enzygnost])三家公司的三种市售酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)以及两种嗜异性抗体乳胶凝集试验(莫诺莱克斯[Biotest]和莫诺-莱克斯[Trinity Laboratories])进行了评估,以诊断原发性爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)感染和EBV血清阳性。在一家临床微生物实验室,用这五种检测方法对197例有原发性EBV感染症状患者的214份连续样本进行了分析。这些样本还在一家参考实验室通过免疫荧光法进行了独立分析。根据参考方法,37例患者(40份血清样本)有原发性EBV感染,120例患者(127份血清样本)曾有过EBV感染,33例患者(36份血清样本)血清学阴性,7例患者(11份血清样本)表现出非典型反应。古尔德检测法诊断原发性EBV感染的敏感性和特异性分别为95%和100%,比奥泰克检测法为100%和94%,恩齐诺斯特检测法为100%和89%。莫诺莱克斯和莫诺-莱克斯方法在诊断原发性EBV感染方面显示出相似的敏感性和特异性(分别为78%至85%和100%至99%)。这项研究证明了市售检测方法对原发性EBV感染快速诊断的有用性,但也表明了在选择检测方法之前对常规样本进行大规模检测的重要性。

相似文献

4
Reliability of four methods for the diagnosis of acute infection by Epstein-Barr virus.四种诊断爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒急性感染方法的可靠性
J Clin Lab Anal. 1997;11(2):78-81. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2825(1997)11:2<78::AID-JCLA2>3.0.CO;2-G.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验