Karvar S, Karch H, Frosch M, Burghardt W, Gross U
Clinic for Internal Medicine, University of Würzburg, Germany.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Dec;35(12):3058-61. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3058-3061.1997.
Multiple invasive and noninvasive tests for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection are available. The current "gold standard" for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection requires histology and the rapid urease test. Our aim was to test the performance of immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG immunoblot assays in comparison with that of the gold standard tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Ninety patients who underwent gastroscopy were analyzed in a prospective study. Fifty-nine of them were defined to be H. pylori positive by the gold standard tests. The IgA and IgG immunoblot assays correctly identified H. pylori infection in 17 and 58 of these patients, respectively, indicating that determination of IgA antibodies seems to be of low diagnostic value for H. pylori infection. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of the IgG immunoblot assay were 98 and 71%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 87 and 96%, respectively. Therefore, the IgG immunoblot assay proved to be a sensitive and useful, noninvasive test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.
有多种用于检测幽门螺杆菌感染的侵入性和非侵入性检测方法。目前诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的“金标准”需要组织学检查和快速尿素酶试验。我们的目的是将免疫球蛋白A(IgA)和IgG免疫印迹检测的性能与诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的金标准检测方法进行比较。在一项前瞻性研究中对90例接受胃镜检查的患者进行了分析。其中59例经金标准检测确定为幽门螺杆菌阳性。IgA和IgG免疫印迹检测分别在其中17例和58例患者中正确识别出幽门螺杆菌感染,这表明检测IgA抗体对幽门螺杆菌感染的诊断价值似乎较低。相比之下,IgG免疫印迹检测的敏感性和特异性分别为98%和71%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为87%和96%。因此,IgG免疫印迹检测被证明是一种用于诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的敏感且有用的非侵入性检测方法。