Suppr超能文献

用于聚合酶链反应的衣原体DNA提取:检测中的稳定性和灵敏度

Chlamydia DNA extraction for use in PCR: stability and sensitivity in detection.

作者信息

Daugharty H, Skelton S K, Messmer T

机构信息

National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 1998;12(1):47-53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2825(1998)12:1<47::AID-JCLA8>3.0.CO;2-G.

Abstract

We evaluated multiple procedures for extracting chlamydial DNA from specimens for detection in PCR tests. Commercial kits and an in-house method were tested for their sensitivity and utility. Quantifiable chlamydial elementary bodies (EB) were used for spiking buffy coats from EDTA-collected blood. EBs of Chlamydia pneumoniae at 2,500 and 25 EB/ml were used as specimens for DNA extraction using seven different procedures. These included either columns (3 procedures), centrifugation (1), glass (1), or patented extraction matrices (2), coupled with either alcohol precipitation (6) or heat-detergent treatment (1). Five procedures required 10-40 minutes manipulation; two required 2-5 hours. PCR results for DNA extracts using chlamydial 16S genus primers were generally more intensely positive with denser bands on electrophoresis gels for the higher concentrations of EB (up to 4+ for stained product on gels) than was PCR with lower EB concentrations (up to 2+). Further, the incidence of procedures with positive results was: 5 of 7 for chlamydial genus primers with 5 EB vs. 6 of 7 with 500 EB. Maximal sensitivity for one of the extractions was in the range of 2.5-5.0 EB/ml of test specimen with 4 of 5 replicates being positive with EB controls or extracts. Extracts were stable up to 2+ weeks at 4 degrees C and were effective in multiplexing with fluorescent-tagged primers. Taking into consideration the time factor and sensitivities, the two procedures with extraction matrices are favored for routine laboratory use.

摘要

我们评估了多种从标本中提取衣原体DNA以用于PCR检测的方法。对商业试剂盒和一种内部方法的灵敏度和实用性进行了测试。使用可定量的衣原体原体(EB)对EDTA抗凝血液的血沉棕黄层进行加样。将肺炎衣原体2500 EB/ml和25 EB/ml的EB用作标本,采用七种不同方法提取DNA。这些方法包括柱法(3种)、离心法(1种)、玻璃法(1种)或专利提取基质法(2种),并结合酒精沉淀法(6种)或热去污剂处理法(1种)。五种方法需要10 - 40分钟操作;两种需要2 - 5小时。使用衣原体16S属引物对DNA提取物进行PCR检测,对于较高浓度的EB(凝胶上染色产物最高可达4 +),电泳凝胶上的条带通常比低EB浓度(最高可达2 +)时更亮且阳性更强。此外,阳性结果的方法发生率为:衣原体属引物检测5 EB时7种方法中有5种阳性,而检测500 EB时7种方法中有6种阳性。其中一种提取方法的最大灵敏度在2.5 - 5.0 EB/ml的测试标本范围内,5次重复中有4次EB对照或提取物呈阳性。提取物在4℃下可稳定保存长达2周以上,并且能与荧光标记引物有效进行多重检测。考虑到时间因素和灵敏度,两种采用提取基质的方法更适合常规实验室使用。

相似文献

1
Chlamydia DNA extraction for use in PCR: stability and sensitivity in detection.用于聚合酶链反应的衣原体DNA提取:检测中的稳定性和灵敏度
J Clin Lab Anal. 1998;12(1):47-53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2825(1998)12:1<47::AID-JCLA8>3.0.CO;2-G.
8
Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of positive urine specimens.污染的手指:尿液标本阳性的潜在原因。
Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Feb;94(1):32-36. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-053081. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

2
Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR).肺炎衣原体(TW株)
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995 Oct;8(4):451-61. doi: 10.1128/CMR.8.4.451.
4
Infectious agents in reactive arthritis.
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1993 Jul;5(4):414-9. doi: 10.1097/00002281-199305040-00003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验