• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rationing and the health authority.医疗资源分配与卫生当局
BMJ. 1998 Oct 17;317(7165):1067-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1067.
2
Rationing and unfairness in the National Health Service: who is responsible, who is to blame and what can be done about it?国民医疗服务体系中的配给与不公平：谁负责、谁之过以及如何应对？
J Nurs Manag. 1996 Jul;4(4):187-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.1996.tb00049.x.
3
A policy agenda for health care rationing.医疗资源分配的政策议程。
Br Med Bull. 1995 Oct;51(4):885-99. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a073003.
4
The real ethics of rationing.配给制的真正伦理问题。
BMJ. 1997 Jul 12;315(7100):112-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7100.112.
5
The political economy of rationing health care in England and the US: the 'accidental logics' of political settlements.英国和美国医疗保健配给的政治经济学：政治解决方案的“偶然逻辑”
Health Econ Policy Law. 2014 Jul;9(3):273-94. doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000127. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
6
The rationing debate. Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions. The case against.配给制辩论。中央政府在配给决策中应发挥更大作用。反对观点。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):970-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.970.
7
Rationing in the fiscal ice age.财政冰河时代的配给制。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Oct;5(4):389-96. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000095. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
8
Doctors and resource management: incentives and goodwill.医生与资源管理：激励与善意。
Health Policy. 1993 Apr;24(1):71-82. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(93)90089-8.
9
On being NICE in the UK: guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales.英国的“国民健康与临床优化研究所”（NICE）：英格兰和威尔士国民医疗服务体系（NHS）技术评估指南
Health Econ. 2002 Apr;11(3):185-91. doi: 10.1002/hec.706.
10
The rationing debate. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit. The case for.配给制辩论。国民医疗服务体系内的配给制应该是明确的。支持的理由。
BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1114-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1114.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors explaining priority setting at community mental health centres: a quantitative analysis of referral assessments.解释社区心理健康中心优先次序设定的因素：转诊评估的定量分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 14;14:620. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0620-3.
2
Pandemic influenza: implications for preparation and delivery of critical care services.大流行性流感：对危重病护理服务的准备和提供的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):347-67. doi: 10.1177/0885066610393314. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
3
Currents in contemporary ethics. Should health care providers get treatment priority in an influenza pandemic?当代伦理学中的热点问题。在流感大流行期间，医疗保健提供者是否应获得治疗优先权？
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Summer;38(2):412-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00499.x.
4
Ethics and opportunity costs: have NICE grasped the ethics of priority setting?伦理与机会成本：英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所是否把握了优先级设定的伦理原则？
J Med Ethics. 2006 Mar;32(3):127-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014860.
5
"Saying no is no easy matter" a qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice.“说‘不’并非易事”：一项关于全科医疗中配给决策中相互竞争问题的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Nov 9;5:70. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-70.
6
What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?加拿大安大略省的医院决策者对于其所在机构中确定优先次序的公平性有何看法？
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Jan 21;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-8.
7
Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success.医疗保健机构中的优先级设定：成功的标准、流程和参数
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Sep 8;4(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-25.
8
A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions.一种改善医疗机构中确定优先事项的策略。
Health Care Anal. 2003 Mar;11(1):59-68. doi: 10.1023/A:1025338013629.
9
Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.引出理由：优先排序中的实证方法
Health Care Anal. 2003 Mar;11(1):41-58. doi: 10.1023/A:1025385929559.
10
Rationing of expensive medical care in a transition country--nihil novum?转型国家中昂贵医疗服务的配给——难道没有新情况？
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):308-12. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.308.

本文引用的文献

1
ALS/MND and the perspective of health economics.
J Neurol Sci. 1998 Oct;160 Suppl 1:S2-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(98)00192-0.
2
How cost-effective is oral isotretinoin?口服异维A酸的性价比如何？
Dermatology. 1997;195 Suppl 1:10-4; discussion 38-40. doi: 10.1159/000246014.
3
The rationing debate: Maximising the health of the whole community. The case against: what the principal objective of the NHS should really be.配给制辩论：最大化整个社区的健康。反对观点：国民保健制度的主要目标究竟应该是什么。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 1;314(7081):669-72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7081.669.
4
The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 2: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery.新西兰优先标准项目。第2部分：冠状动脉搭桥手术。
BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):135-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.135.
5
The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview.新西兰优先标准项目。第1部分：概述。
BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):131-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.131.
6
The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.英国国家医疗服务体系中的配给议程。配给议程小组。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1593-601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593.
7
Choices in health care. A review of a report by the government Committee on Choices in Health Care. Ministry of Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs, The Netherlands, 1992.医疗保健中的选择。对荷兰福利、卫生和文化事务部医疗保健选择政府委员会一份报告的综述，1992年。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1992 Oct;26(4):390-2.

Rationing and the health authority.

作者信息

Hope T, Hicks N, Reynolds D J, Crisp R, Griffiths S

机构信息

Division of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LF.

出版信息

BMJ. 1998 Oct 17;317(7165):1067-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1067.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1067
PMID:9774299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1114068/
Abstract
摘要