Schedle A, Franz A, Rausch-Fan X, Spittler A, Lucas T, Samorapoompichit P, Sperr W, Boltz-Nitulescu G
Institute of General and Experimental Pathology, University of Vienna, Austria.
Dent Mater. 1998 Nov;14(6):429-40. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00018-4.
Although research interest in biocompatibility of dental materials has been increasing, findings are frequently controversial and non-harmonized experimental approaches often lead to the production of contradictory results. The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxic effects of six different light-cured dental composites, one compomer, one advanced glass-ionomer, two glass-ionomer cements, two zinc phosphate cements, one calcium hydroxide liner, one composite cement and one carboxylate cement with the same standardized cell-culture system. Two composites, one compomer and one advanced glass-ionomer were also tested in combination with the appropriate bonding substances and surface primers.
Specimens were added to the cultures immediately after production or after preincubation for 1, 2 or 7 days or 6 weeks under cell-culture conditions. Specimens were incubated with L-929 fibroblasts for 72 h and cell numbers determined by flow cytometry.
All freshly prepared composite materials were cytotoxic. These effects diminished with increased preincubation times and were not significant after 7 days. Combinations of composites and bonding substances were still cytotoxic after preincubation for 7 days, but not after 6 weeks. Combinations of compomers and bonding substances demonstrated stronger toxicity than composites, although these effects were reduced earlier during preincubation. Glass-ionomer and phosphate cements showed similar effects to the composites with the exception of carboxylate cement, which demonstrated severe and persistent effects even after 6 weeks' preincubation. Together, our data provide evidence that all dental materials tested are cytotoxic immediately after production and that these effects are reduced after different preincubation periods in most cases.
Tested with a standardized cell-culture system, differences in toxicological potency between various commonly used dental materials were observed. Cytotoxicity data from standardized protocols should form the basis of screening the cytotoxic effects of new materials.
尽管对牙科材料生物相容性的研究兴趣日益增加,但研究结果常常存在争议,且实验方法不一致往往导致产生相互矛盾的结果。本研究的目的是使用相同的标准化细胞培养系统,比较六种不同的光固化牙科复合材料、一种聚合体、一种高级玻璃离子水门汀、两种玻璃离子粘固剂、两种磷酸锌粘固剂、一种氢氧化钙衬层、一种复合粘固剂和一种羧酸盐粘固剂的细胞毒性作用。还对两种复合材料、一种聚合体和一种高级玻璃离子水门汀与相应的粘结剂和表面底漆联合进行了测试。
在细胞培养条件下,标本在制作后或预孵育1天、2天、7天或6周后立即添加到培养物中。将标本与L-929成纤维细胞孵育72小时,并通过流式细胞术测定细胞数量。
所有新制备的复合材料都具有细胞毒性。随着预孵育时间的增加,这些影响会减弱,7天后不显著。复合材料与粘结剂的组合在预孵育7天后仍具有细胞毒性,但6周后则无。聚合体与粘结剂的组合显示出比复合材料更强的毒性,尽管这些影响在预孵育期间更早降低。除羧酸盐粘固剂外,玻璃离子水门汀和磷酸锌粘固剂与复合材料表现出相似的效果,羧酸盐粘固剂即使在预孵育6周后仍表现出严重且持续的影响。总之,我们的数据表明,所有测试的牙科材料在制作后立即具有细胞毒性,并且在大多数情况下,这些影响在不同的预孵育期后会降低。
使用标准化细胞培养系统进行测试时,观察到各种常用牙科材料之间毒理学效力的差异。来自标准化方案的细胞毒性数据应构成筛选新材料细胞毒性作用的基础。