McLoughlin E, Vince C J, Lee A M, Crawford J D
Am J Public Health. 1982 Mar;72(3):241-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.3.241.
Project Burn Prevention was designed and implemented to determine the ability of a public education program to increase awareness about burn hazards and reduce the incidence and severity of burn injuries. Media messages were transmitted to residents of a large metropolitan area; separate school and community interventions were implemented in two demographically similar communities within the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). A second metropolitan area and two of its communities served as control sites. Messages for specific, high-risk age groups emphasized flame burns because of their severity and scalds because of their frequency. Knowledge gains were demonstrable only as a result of the school program. Neither the school program nor the media campaign reduced burn incidence or severity; the community intervention may have brought about a moderate, temporary reduction in injuries. Multiplicity of messages, brevity of the campaign, and separation of the interventions are among possible reasons for the program's failure to significantly reduce burn injuries. Education for personal responsibility is not sufficient. Product modification and environmental redesign must be instituted through education and legislation for successful control of burn injuries.
预防烧伤项目的设计与实施旨在确定一项公共教育计划提高人们对烧伤危害的认识、降低烧伤发生率和严重程度的能力。向一个大都市地区的居民传播了媒体信息;在标准大都市统计区(SMSA)内两个在人口统计学上相似的社区实施了单独的学校和社区干预措施。另一个大都市地区及其两个社区作为对照地点。针对特定的高风险年龄组的信息强调了火焰烧伤(因其严重性)和烫伤(因其发生频率)。知识的增加仅在学校项目实施后得到了证明。学校项目和媒体宣传活动都没有降低烧伤的发生率或严重程度;社区干预可能使受伤情况有了适度的、暂时的减少。信息的多样性、活动的短暂性以及干预措施的分离是该项目未能显著减少烧伤的可能原因。仅进行个人责任教育是不够的。必须通过教育和立法来进行产品改良和环境重新设计,以成功控制烧伤。