Suppr超能文献

在自由联想任务中,启动作为联想方向性的函数。

Priming in a free association task as a function of association directionality.

作者信息

Zeelenberg R, Shiffrin R M, Raaijmakers J G

机构信息

University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1999 Nov;27(6):956-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03201226.

Abstract

Two experiments investigated priming in free association, a conceptual implicit memory task. The stimuli consisted of bidirectionally associated word pairs (e.g., BEACH-SAND) and unidirectionally associated word pairs that have no association from the target response back to the stimulus cue (e.g., BONE-DOG). In the study phase, target words (e.g., SAND, DOG) were presented in an incidental learning task. In the test phase, participants generated an associate to the stimulus cues (e.g., BEACH, BONE). In both experiments, priming was obtained for targets (e.g., SAND) that had an association back to the cue, but not for targets (e.g., DOG) for which such a backward association was absent. These results are problematic for theoretical accounts that attribute priming in free association to the strengthening of target responses. It is argued that priming in free association depends on the strengthening of cue-target associations.

摘要

两项实验研究了自由联想中的启动效应,这是一种概念性内隐记忆任务。刺激材料由双向关联的词对(如BEACH-SAND)和单向关联的词对组成,单向关联的词对从目标反应到刺激线索没有关联(如BONE-DOG)。在学习阶段,目标词(如SAND、DOG)在一个附带学习任务中呈现。在测试阶段,参与者为刺激线索(如BEACH、BONE)生成一个联想词。在两项实验中,对于那些与线索有反向关联的目标词(如SAND)获得了启动效应,但对于那些不存在这种反向关联的目标词(如DOG)则没有获得启动效应。这些结果对于将自由联想中的启动效应归因于目标反应增强的理论解释来说是有问题的。有人认为,自由联想中的启动效应取决于线索-目标关联的增强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验