Brook I, Controni G
J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):676-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.676-679.1978.
The Monotest Lactate Kit (MLT) was compared with gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) for the rapid detection of septic arthritis. A total of 36 joint fluids were tested. Specimens were obtained from patients with septic arthritis (17 cases), inflammatory arthritis (18 cases), and degenerative arthritis (1 case). Specimens from 15 patients with bacterial arthritis had lactate levels above 65 mg/dl (mean, 318 mg/dl with the GLC method and 378 mg/dl with the MLT method). Three specimens from patients with gonococcal arthritis had levels that were not above 30 mg/dl (mean, 21 mg/dl with either the GLC or the MLT methods). Patients with inflammatory or degenerative disease yielded levels lower than 65 mg/dl (mean, 48 mg/dl with the GLC method and 46 mg/dl with the MLT method). Both methods proved to be equallly reliable in detecting septic arthritis, except for the gonococcal cases. Both methods are fast and easily adaptable to clinical laboratories; however, MLT was more definitive when quantitation was needed, required less fluid per speciment, and could be readily done at the bedside.
将用于快速检测化脓性关节炎的单测试乳酸试剂盒(MLT)与气液色谱法(GLC)进行了比较。共检测了36份关节液。样本取自化脓性关节炎患者(17例)、炎性关节炎患者(18例)和退行性关节炎患者(1例)。15例细菌性关节炎患者的样本乳酸水平高于65mg/dl(气液色谱法均值为318mg/dl,单测试乳酸试剂盒法均值为378mg/dl)。3例淋菌性关节炎患者的样本水平不高于30mg/dl(气液色谱法或单测试乳酸试剂盒法均值均为21mg/dl)。炎性或退行性疾病患者的样本水平低于65mg/dl(气液色谱法均值为48mg/dl,单测试乳酸试剂盒法均值为46mg/dl)。除淋菌性病例外,两种方法在检测化脓性关节炎方面均被证明同样可靠。两种方法都快速且易于应用于临床实验室;然而,在需要定量时,单测试乳酸试剂盒法更具决定性,每个样本所需液体更少,并且可以在床边轻松完成。