Hannoun C, Tumova B
National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2000 Mar;16(3):217-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1007694403246.
The survey was undertaken by ESWI in order to investigate the comparability of the laboratory diagnostic methods and the influenza surveillance systems used in 24 European countries. The results indicate considerable consensus in the general approaches to collection and use of clinical specimens, rapid diagnostic techniques, virus isolation techniques in eggs or/and MDCK cell lines, virus identification and use of inhibition of hemagglutination (IHA) and complement fixation (CF) tests for serological diagnostics. However, the details of the techniques used are somewhat heterogeneous: antigen detection methods (immunofluorescence versus immuno adsorbent assay), isolation methods (eggs versus tissue culture), reagents (locally produced, WHO, commercial) are not always equivalent and results are therefore not really comparable. Some of these discrepancies are due to a lack of resources or a lack of priority for influenza in the country. The greatest differences between individual countries exist in the epidemiological part of surveillance programmes. The mode of collection of influenza related mortality and absentism from work varies considerably in different countries. These findings indicate the need to harmonize viral procedures and surveillance systems in European countries in order to improve validity and comparability of results and as a prerequisite for early information on influenza etiology and spread.
欧洲卫生系统与政策观察站(ESWI)开展了此项调查,以研究24个欧洲国家所使用的实验室诊断方法和流感监测系统的可比性。结果表明,在临床标本采集和使用的一般方法、快速诊断技术、在鸡蛋或/和犬肾传代细胞系中的病毒分离技术、病毒鉴定以及用于血清学诊断的血凝抑制(IHA)和补体结合(CF)试验的使用等方面,存在相当大的共识。然而,所使用技术的细节在一定程度上存在差异:抗原检测方法(免疫荧光法与免疫吸附测定法)、分离方法(鸡蛋法与组织培养法)、试剂(本地生产、世卫组织提供、商业试剂)并不总是等效的,因此结果并非真正具有可比性。其中一些差异是由于国家缺乏资源或对流感缺乏重视。各国之间最大的差异存在于监测计划的流行病学部分。不同国家在流感相关死亡率和工作缺勤率的收集方式上存在很大差异。这些发现表明,欧洲国家需要统一病毒检测程序和监测系统,以提高结果的有效性和可比性,并作为获取流感病因和传播早期信息的前提条件。