Nemec A, Dijkshoorn L, Jezek P
National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(11):3937-41. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.11.3937-3941.2000.
Genomic species diversity among 147 Acinetobacter clinical isolates not belonging to the A. calcoaceticus- A. baumannii (ACB) complex was investigated by phenotypic and genotypic identification methods. The isolates were obtained between 1991 and 1999 from numerous diagnostic laboratories in the Czech Republic and were studied by numerical probabilistic identification using two biochemical frequency matrices and amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA). Their final identification was derived from the combined phenotypic and ARDRA results. In total, 102 isolates were unambiguously (n = 89) or presumptively (n = 13) identified as A. lwoffii (n = 63), genomic species 13BJ/14TU (n = 9), A. johnsonii (n = 7), A. haemolyticus (n = 6), A. junii (n = 5), and other genomic species (n < 5 isolates each). Forty-five isolates could not be identified as belonging to any described species. Among the unidentified isolates two large groups of non-glucose-acidifying, nonhemolytic, and non-gelatinase-producing isolates were distinguished. These groups, designated phenon 1 (n = 17) and phenon 2 (n = 15), had distinctive phenotypic features and novel ARDRA profiles, which suggests that they represent hitherto undescribed Acinetobacter species. Phenon 2 included mainly clinically insignificant isolates from outpatients, while phenon 1 comprised clinically relevant isolates mostly from the blood of hospitalized patients, and its precise taxonomic definition may therefore be of medical importance. Overall, the development of practical methods for identification required for the elucidation of the biological significance of the (genomic) species within the genus Acinetobacter remains a challenging task.
采用表型和基因型鉴定方法,对147株不属于醋酸钙不动杆菌-鲍曼不动杆菌(ACB)复合体的不动杆菌临床分离株的基因组物种多样性进行了研究。这些分离株于1991年至1999年间从捷克共和国的众多诊断实验室获得,并使用两种生化频率矩阵和扩增rDNA限制性分析(ARDRA)通过数值概率鉴定法进行研究。它们的最终鉴定来自表型和ARDRA结果的综合。总共,102株分离株被明确(n = 89)或推测(n = 13)鉴定为洛菲不动杆菌(n = 63)、基因组物种13BJ/14TU(n = 9)、约翰逊不动杆菌(n = 7)、溶血不动杆菌(n = 6)、琼氏不动杆菌(n = 5)和其他基因组物种(每种n < 5株)。45株分离株无法鉴定为属于任何已描述的物种。在未鉴定的分离株中,区分出两组非葡萄糖酸化、非溶血和非产明胶酶的分离株。这些组分别命名为菌型1(n = 17)和菌型2(n = 15),具有独特的表型特征和新颖的ARDRA图谱,这表明它们代表迄今未描述的不动杆菌物种。菌型2主要包括来自门诊患者的临床意义不大的分离株,而菌型1主要包括大多来自住院患者血液的临床相关分离株,因此其精确的分类学定义可能具有医学重要性。总体而言,开发用于阐明不动杆菌属内(基因组)物种生物学意义所需的实用鉴定方法仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。