Berntsen Dorthe
Department of Psychology, University of Aarhus, Risskov, Denmark.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1010-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03194319.
In three experiments, undergraduates recorded as many details as possible for autobiographical memories of highly positive and highly negative events in their lives. Experiment 1 replicated earlier findings for memories of highly negative events: Central details were recorded more frequently than peripheral details, and a weak correlation was found between emotional intensity and number of central details. In Experiment 2, undergraduates recorded details of memories of both their happiest and their most shocking events. Central details dominated over peripheral details only in memories of shocking events. This finding was replicated in Experiment 3. Recording memory details affected the participants' moods and generated a mood congruence effect in a subsequent recall of word-cued memories. The finding suggest that tunnel memories--enhanced memory for the central details of an event--are limited to emotionally negative memories. The findings contradict expectations derived from the notion of repression.
在三项实验中,大学生尽可能多地记录了他们生活中高度积极和高度消极事件的自传式记忆细节。实验1重复了早期关于高度消极事件记忆的研究结果:核心细节比边缘细节被记录得更频繁,并且在情绪强度和核心细节数量之间发现了微弱的相关性。在实验2中,大学生记录了他们最快乐和最令人震惊事件的记忆细节。只有在令人震惊事件的记忆中,核心细节才比边缘细节占主导地位。这一发现在实验3中得到了重复。记录记忆细节影响了参与者的情绪,并在随后对单词提示记忆的回忆中产生了情绪一致性效应。研究结果表明,隧道记忆——对事件核心细节的增强记忆——仅限于情绪消极的记忆。这些发现与从压抑概念中得出的预期相矛盾。