Watanabe Akiharu, Matsuzaki Shohei, Moriwaki Hisataka, Suzuki Kazuyuki, Nishiguchi Shuhei
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Toyama, Japan.
Nutrition. 2004 Apr;20(4):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2003.12.006.
To clarify problems with the determination of serum albumin levels, the definition of hypoalbuminemia, and the implications of microheterogeneity of albumin, serum albumin was measured by using dye-binding methods and the authentic method (immunoassay) in patients with liver cirrhosis and healthy subjects.
We enrolled 103 patients with liver cirrhosis and 36 healthy subjects. Serum albumin levels were analyzed by immunoassay and the bromcresol green and bromcresol purple methods. Oxidized albumin and glycoalbumin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.
In cirrhotic patients, serum albumin levels measured by the bromcresol green method was about 0.2 g/dL higher than that by immunoassay. Serum albumin levels measured by the bromcresol purple method also was higher in cirrhotic patients than those measured by immunoassay and varied widely. In addition, extensive variation was found across serum albumin levels determined by the bromcresol green method at individual institutions (five university hospitals) and those determined by immunoassay at a contract laboratory. The percentages of oxidized albumin and glycoalbumin within total serum albumin increased with progression of liver disease. Further, an increase in oxidized albumin led to an increase in the albumin level as measured by the bromcresol purple method.
These results show that adequate assessment of the pathophysiology and prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis and the efficacy of treatment is not possible with dye-binding methods for determination of serum albumin. Further, the conventional definition of hypoalbuminemia as a serum albumin level of 3.5 g/dL or lower should be reconsidered, and the clinical implications of qualitative changes in albumin should be investigated in consideration of the microheterogeneity of albumin, such as oxidized albumin and glycoalbumin.
为阐明血清白蛋白水平测定、低白蛋白血症的定义以及白蛋白微异质性的影响方面存在的问题,我们采用染料结合法和真实方法(免疫测定法)对肝硬化患者和健康受试者的血清白蛋白进行了测定。
我们纳入了103例肝硬化患者和36名健康受试者。通过免疫测定法、溴甲酚绿法和溴甲酚紫法分析血清白蛋白水平。采用高效液相色谱法测定氧化型白蛋白和糖基化白蛋白。
在肝硬化患者中,溴甲酚绿法测定的血清白蛋白水平比免疫测定法高约0.2g/dL。溴甲酚紫法测定的肝硬化患者血清白蛋白水平也高于免疫测定法,且差异较大。此外,在各个机构(五所大学医院)采用溴甲酚绿法测定的血清白蛋白水平与在一家合同实验室采用免疫测定法测定的血清白蛋白水平之间存在广泛差异。随着肝病进展,血清总白蛋白中氧化型白蛋白和糖基化白蛋白的百分比增加。此外,氧化型白蛋白增加导致溴甲酚紫法测定的白蛋白水平升高。
这些结果表明,采用染料结合法测定血清白蛋白无法对肝硬化患者的病理生理学和预后以及治疗效果进行充分评估。此外,应重新考虑将血清白蛋白水平≤3.5g/dL作为低白蛋白血症的传统定义,并应考虑白蛋白的微异质性,如氧化型白蛋白和糖基化白蛋白,研究白蛋白定性变化的临床意义。