Suzuki Akinobu, Josselyn Sheena A, Frankland Paul W, Masushige Shoichi, Silva Alcino J, Kida Satoshi
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Bioscience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan.
J Neurosci. 2004 May 19;24(20):4787-95. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5491-03.2004.
Memory retrieval is not a passive phenomenon. Instead, it triggers a number of processes that either reinforce or alter stored information. Retrieval is thought to activate a second memory consolidation cascade (reconsolidation) that requires protein synthesis. Here, we show that the temporal dynamics of memory reconsolidation are dependent on the strength and age of the memory, such that younger and weaker memories are more easily reconsolidated than older and stronger memories. We also report that reconsolidation and extinction, two opposing processes triggered by memory retrieval, have distinct biochemical signatures: pharmacological antagonism of either cannabinoid receptor 1 or L-type voltage-gated calcium channels blocks extinction but not reconsolidation. These studies demonstrate the dynamic nature of memory processing after retrieval and represent a first step toward a molecular dissection of underlying mechanisms.
记忆提取并非被动现象。相反,它会引发一系列强化或改变存储信息的过程。提取被认为会激活一个需要蛋白质合成的第二记忆巩固级联反应(重新巩固)。在此,我们表明记忆重新巩固的时间动态取决于记忆的强度和时长,以至于较新且较弱的记忆比较旧且较强的记忆更容易重新巩固。我们还报告称,重新巩固和消退是由记忆提取引发的两个相反过程,具有不同的生化特征:大麻素受体1或L型电压门控钙通道的药理学拮抗作用会阻断消退,但不会阻断重新巩固。这些研究证明了提取后记忆处理的动态性质,并代表了对潜在机制进行分子剖析的第一步。