van Hoof Ambro
University of Texas Health Science Center, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Genetics. 2005 Dec;171(4):1455-61. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.044057. Epub 2005 Jun 18.
Gene duplication is often cited as a potential mechanism for the evolution of new traits, but this hypothesis has not been thoroughly tested experimentally. A classical model of gene duplication states that after gene duplication one copy of the gene preserves the ancestral function, while the other copy is free to evolve a new function. In an alternative duplication, divergence, and complementation model, duplicated genes are preserved because each copy of the gene loses some, but not all, of its functions through degenerating mutations. This results in the degenerating mutations in one gene being complemented by the other and vice versa. These two models make very different predictions about the function of the preduplication orthologs in closely related species. These predictions have been tested here for several duplicated yeast genes that appeared to be the leading candidates to fit the classical model. Surprisingly, the results show that duplicated genes are maintained because each copy carries out a subset of the conserved functions that were already present in the preduplication gene. Therefore, the results are not consistent with the classical model, but instead fit the duplication, divergence, and complementation model.
基因复制常被视为新性状进化的一种潜在机制,但这一假说尚未经过全面的实验验证。基因复制的经典模型指出,基因复制后,其中一个基因拷贝保留祖先功能,而另一个拷贝则可自由进化出新功能。在另一种复制、分化和互补模型中,复制后的基因得以保留,是因为每个基因拷贝通过退化突变失去了部分而非全部功能。这导致一个基因中的退化突变由另一个基因互补,反之亦然。这两种模型对于近缘物种中复制前直系同源基因的功能做出了截然不同的预测。在此,针对几个似乎最符合经典模型的酵母复制基因对这些预测进行了验证。令人惊讶的是,结果表明复制后的基因得以保留是因为每个拷贝都执行了复制前基因中已存在的部分保守功能。因此,结果与经典模型不一致,而是符合复制、分化和互补模型。