• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams.通过培训高可靠性团队促进医疗保健安全。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):303-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010090.
2
Measuring team performance in simulation-based training: adopting best practices for healthcare.在基于模拟的培训中衡量团队绩效:采用医疗保健领域的最佳实践。
Simul Healthc. 2008 Spring;3(1):33-41. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181626276.
3
Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations.团队合作是高可靠性组织的重要组成部分。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1576-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00566.x.
4
Creating a systems approach to patient safety through better teamwork.通过改善团队合作创建一种保障患者安全的系统方法。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2006 May-Jun;40(3):205-7. doi: 10.2345/i0899-8205-40-3-205.1.
5
High Reliability and Excellence in Staffing.
Nurs Econ. 2015 Sep-Oct;33(5):283-4.
6
Contextual learning to improve health care and patient safety.情境学习以改善医疗保健和患者安全。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2007 Nov;20(3):124. Epub 2007 Nov 23.
7
Evaluating multidisciplinary health care teams: taking the crisis out of CRM.评估多学科医疗团队:消除危机管理中的危机。
Aust Health Rev. 2009 Aug;33(3):445-52. doi: 10.1071/ah090445.
8
High reliability organizations (HROs).高可靠性组织(HRO)。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;25(2):133-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.03.001.
9
Are hospitals becoming high reliability organizations?医院是否正在成为高可靠性组织?
Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep;41(5):713-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
10
Patient safety in women's health care: a framework for progress.女性医疗保健中的患者安全:进展框架
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;21(4):525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.01.012. Epub 2007 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative investigation of military surgical resuscitation teams: what are the drivers of success of a rapid response team?军事外科复苏小组的定性研究:快速反应小组成功的驱动因素是什么?
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 23;14(3):e076000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076000.
2
Clinical Informatics Team Members' Perspectives on Health Information Technology Safety After Experiential Learning and Safety Process Development: Qualitative Descriptive Study.临床信息学团队成员对体验式学习和安全流程开发后健康信息技术安全的看法:定性描述性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 5;8:e53302. doi: 10.2196/53302.
3
Team-focused implementation strategies to improve implementation of mental health screening and referral in rural Children's Advocacy Centers: study protocol for a pilot cluster randomized hybrid type 2 trial.以团队为中心的实施策略,以改善农村儿童权益倡导中心的心理健康筛查和转诊工作:一项2型混合试点整群随机试验的研究方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 May 26;4(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00437-z.
4
Associations between teamwork and implementation outcomes in multidisciplinary cross-sector teams implementing a mental health screening and referral protocol.在实施心理健康筛查与转诊方案的多学科跨部门团队中,团队合作与实施成果之间的关联。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Feb 10;4(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00393-8.
5
Cognitive aids in the management of clinical emergencies: a systematic review.认知辅助在临床急症管理中的应用:系统评价。
Anaesthesia. 2023 Mar;78(3):343-355. doi: 10.1111/anae.15939. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
Defibrillation safety: an examination of paramedic perceptions using eye-tracking technology.除颤安全性:使用眼动追踪技术对护理人员认知的考察
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2015 Sep 3;1(2):62-66. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000033. eCollection 2015.
7
Understanding the Influence of the Junior Attending Role on Transition to Practice: A Qualitative Study.理解初级主治医生角色对实践转变的影响:一项定性研究。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Feb;14(1):89-98. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00728.1.
8
Global Health Training Collaborations: Lessons Learned and Best Practices.全球卫生培训合作:经验教训和最佳实践。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Nov 29;106(2):412-418. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0193.
9
Prioritizing the Interview in Selecting Resident Applicants: Behavioral Interviews to Determine Goodness of Fit.在选拔住院医师申请人时优先考虑面试:通过行为面试来确定是否匹配。
Acad Pathol. 2021 Oct 25;8:23742895211052885. doi: 10.1177/23742895211052885. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
10
A Bottom Up Perspective to Understanding the Dynamics of Team Roles in Mission Critical Teams.一种自下而上的视角,用于理解关键任务团队中团队角色的动态变化。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 11;10:1322. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01322. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness.组织中的团队:近期关于绩效与效能的研究
Annu Rev Psychol. 1996;47:307-38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307.
2
Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project.通过正式的团队合作培训减少急诊科的失误并提高绩效:MedTeams项目的评估结果
Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec;37(6):1553-81. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01104.
3
Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare system.医疗系统中事件报告的障碍。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):15-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.15.
4
Team training in the skies: does crew resource management (CRM) training work?空中团队培训:机组资源管理(CRM)培训有效吗?
Hum Factors. 2001 Winter;43(4):641-74. doi: 10.1518/001872001775870386.
5
The science of training: a decade of progress.训练科学:十年进展
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:471-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471.
6
On error management: lessons from aviation.论错误管理:来自航空领域的经验教训。
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):781-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.781.
7
Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems.医疗事故的报告与预防:来自非医疗领域未遂事故报告系统的经验教训。
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):759-63. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.759.
8
Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys.医学与航空领域中的失误、压力及团队协作:横断面调查
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):745-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745.
9
We blew it, AMA admits. But Sunbeam may try to hold group to endorsement deal.
Mod Healthc. 1997 Aug 25;27(34):8.
10
The impact of cross-training on team functioning: an empirical investigation.交叉培训对团队运作的影响:一项实证研究。
Hum Factors. 1996 Mar;38(1):87-100. doi: 10.1518/001872096778940741.

通过培训高可靠性团队促进医疗保健安全。

Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams.

作者信息

Wilson K A, Burke C S, Priest H A, Salas E

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32826, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):303-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010090.

DOI:10.1136/qshc.2004.010090
PMID:16076797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1744047/
Abstract

Many organizations have been using teams as a means of achieving organizational outcomes (such as productivity and safety). Research has indicated that teams, especially those operating in complex environments, are not always effective. There is a subset of organizations in which teams operate that are able to balance effectiveness and safety despite the complexities of the environment (for example, aviation, nuclear power). These high reliability organizations (HROs) have begun to be examined as a model for those in other complex domains, such as health care, that strive to reach a status of high reliability. In this paper we analyse the components leading to the effectiveness of HROs by examining the teams that comprise them. We use a systems perspective to uncover the behavioral markers by which high reliability teams (HRTs) are able to uphold the values of their parent organizations, thereby promoting safety. Using these markers, we offer guidelines and developmental strategies that will help the healthcare community to shift more quickly to high reliability status by not focusing solely on the organizational level.

摘要

许多组织一直将团队作为实现组织成果(如生产力和安全性)的一种手段。研究表明,团队,尤其是那些在复杂环境中运作的团队,并非总是有效。在团队运作的组织中有一部分能够在环境复杂的情况下平衡有效性和安全性(例如,航空、核电)。这些高可靠性组织(HRO)已开始被视作其他复杂领域(如医疗保健)中那些努力实现高可靠性状态的组织的典范进行研究。在本文中,我们通过研究构成高可靠性组织的团队来分析促成其有效性的要素。我们采用系统视角来揭示高可靠性团队(HRT)能够维护其母体组织的价值观从而促进安全的行为标志。利用这些标志,我们提供指导方针和发展策略,这将有助于医疗保健界更快地转变为高可靠性状态,而不是仅仅关注组织层面。