Russ Ann J, Shim Janet K, Kaufman Sharon R
Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jun;64(11):2236-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.016. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
With the trend toward an older, sicker dialysis population in the USA, discussions of ethical issues surrounding dialysis have shifted from concerns about access to and availability of the therapy, to growing unease about non-initiation and treatment discontinuation. Recent studies report treatment withdrawal as the leading cause of death among elderly dialysis patients. Yet, the actual activities that move patients toward stopping treatment often remain obscure, even to clinicians and patients themselves. This paper explores that paradox, drawing on anthropological research among patients over age 70, their families, and clinicians in two California renal dialysis units. It concludes that many older patients sacrifice a sense of choice about dialysis in the present to maintain "choice" as both value and possibility for the future. Even so, patients desire more information and communication, provided earlier in their illness, about prognosis, how long they can expect to be on dialysis, and what the impact of the treatment will be on their daily lives. That, with time, there is a transition to be made from dialysis as "treatment" to end of life care could be better explained and managed to alleviate patients' confusion and unneeded isolation.
在美国,随着透析人群老龄化且病情加重的趋势,围绕透析的伦理问题讨论已从对治疗的可及性和可用性的关注,转向对不开始治疗和停止治疗日益增加的不安。最近的研究报告称,治疗中断是老年透析患者死亡的主要原因。然而,促使患者停止治疗的实际行为往往仍不明确,甚至临床医生和患者自身也不清楚。本文利用对加利福尼亚州两个肾透析单位中70岁以上患者、他们的家人以及临床医生的人类学研究,探讨了这一矛盾现象。研究得出结论,许多老年患者为了将“选择”作为未来的价值和可能性加以维持,而牺牲了当下对透析的选择权。即便如此,患者仍希望在患病早期就能获得更多关于预后、预期透析时长以及治疗对其日常生活影响的信息和沟通。随着时间推移,从透析“治疗”向临终关怀的转变若能得到更好的解释和管理,便可以减轻患者的困惑和不必要的孤立感。