• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

句子理解过程中的焦点识别:来自眼动的证据。

Focus identification during sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.

作者信息

Paterson Kevin B, Liversedge Simon P, Filik Ruth, Juhasz Barbara J, White Sarah J, Rayner Keith

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Oct;60(10):1423-45. doi: 10.1080/17470210601100563.

DOI:10.1080/17470210601100563
PMID:17853249
Abstract

Three eye movement experiments investigated focus identification during sentence comprehension. Participants read dative or double-object sentences (i.e., either the direct or indirect object occurred first), and a replacive continuation supplied a contrast that was congruous with either the direct or the indirect object. Experiments 1 and 2 manipulated focus by locating only adjacent to either the direct or indirect object of dative (Experiment 1) or double-object (Experiment 2) sentences. Reading-time effects indicated that the surface position of the focus particle influenced processing. In addition, Experiment 1 reading times were longer when the replacive was incongruous with the constituent that only adjoined, and particle position modulated a similar effect in Experiment 2. Experiment 3 showed that this effect was absent when only was omitted. We conclude that the surface position of a focus particle modulates focus identification during on-line sentence comprehension.

摘要

三项眼动实验研究了句子理解过程中的焦点识别。参与者阅读与格或双宾语句(即直接宾语或间接宾语首先出现),一个替换性延续部分提供了与直接宾语或间接宾语一致的对比。实验1和实验2通过将焦点仅定位在与格(实验1)或双宾语(实验2)句子的直接宾语或间接宾语相邻的位置来操纵焦点。阅读时间效应表明焦点小品词的表面位置影响加工。此外,当替换部分与仅相邻的成分不一致时,实验1的阅读时间更长,并且在实验2中小品词位置调节了类似的效应。实验3表明,当省略“only”时,这种效应不存在。我们得出结论,焦点小品词的表面位置在在线句子理解过程中调节焦点识别。

相似文献

1
Focus identification during sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.句子理解过程中的焦点识别:来自眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Oct;60(10):1423-45. doi: 10.1080/17470210601100563.
2
Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements.处理双重量化句子:来自眼动的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):953-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196727.
3
Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.词汇变量对失语症患者默读阅读理解的影响:来自眼动追踪的证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Sep 18;60(9):2589-2602. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0045.
4
Syntactic ambiguity resolution in dyslexia: An examination of cognitive factors underlying eye movement differences and comprehension failures.阅读障碍中的句法歧义解决:对眼动差异和理解障碍背后认知因素的考察。
Dyslexia. 2019 May;25(2):115-141. doi: 10.1002/dys.1613. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.眼动追踪与功能磁共振成像相结合揭示句子理解过程中语言预测的神经基础。
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
6
Direct speech quotations promote low relative-clause attachment in silent reading of English.直接引语促进英语默读中相对从句的低附着。
Cognition. 2018 Jul;176:248-254. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
7
Recovery of Online Sentence Processing in Aphasia: Eye Movement Changes Resulting From Treatment of Underlying Forms.失语症患者在线句子处理能力的恢复:基于底层形式治疗所导致的眼动变化
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 May 24;60(5):1299-1315. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0108.
8
Reading and listening in people with aphasia: effects of syntactic complexity.失语症患者的阅读和听力:句法复杂度的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Nov;22(4):579-90. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0111). Epub 2013 Jun 28.
9
The effect of noun animacy on the processing of unambiguous sentences: evidence from French relative clauses.名词生命性对明确句加工的影响:来自法语关系从句的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Oct;64(10):1896-905. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.608851. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
10
Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension.句子理解中的信息结构期望
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):114-39. doi: 10.1080/17470210701880171. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlate not optional: PP sprouting and parallelism in "much less" ellipsis.相关性非选项:“much less”省略中的PP萌生与平行性
Glossa. 2019;4(1). doi: 10.5334/gjgl.707. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
2
Early Association of Prosodic Focus with alleen 'only': Evidence from Eye Movements in the Visual-World Paradigm.韵律焦点与“仅”的早期关联:来自视觉世界范式中眼动的证据
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 11;7:150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00150. eCollection 2016.
3
Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in "let alone" ellipsis.保持局部(及最终状态):“更不用说”省略中的剩余偏好。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(7):1278-301. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1062526. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
4
The Role of in Contrasts in and out of Context.关于背景内外对比中的作用。 (原文中“in and out of Context”前面缺少具体内容,这里只能按字面意思翻译,可能不太准确,你可补充完整原文以便更准确翻译。)
Discourse Process. 2013;50(4):249-275. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167.
5
A review on the cognitive function of information structure during language comprehension.信息结构在语言理解中的认知功能综述。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2014 Oct;8(5):353-61. doi: 10.1007/s11571-014-9305-1. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Predicting contrast in sentences with and without focus marking.预测有焦点标记和无焦点标记句子中的对比。
Lingua. 2014 Oct 1;150:78-91. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.008.
7
Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.焦点、新奇及其组合:话语信息结构的加工。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042533. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
8
Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading.句法突出对阅读时眼球运动的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Sep;38(6):740-52. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.740.
9
The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):678-83. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.678.
10
Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension.句子理解中的信息结构期望
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):114-39. doi: 10.1080/17470210701880171. Epub 2008 Apr 18.