Jacobs Elizabeth A, Sadowski Laura S, Rathouz Paul J
Collaborative Research Unit, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1900 West Polk Street, 16th Floor, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):306-11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0357-3.
Many health care providers do not provide adequate language access services for their patients who are limited English-speaking because they view the costs of these services as prohibitive. However, little is known about the costs they might bear because of unaddressed language barriers or the costs of providing language access services.
To investigate how language barriers and the provision of enhanced interpreter services impact the costs of a hospital stay.
Prospective intervention study.
Public hospital inpatient medicine service.
Three hundred twenty-three adult inpatients: 124 Spanish-speakers whose physicians had access to the enhanced interpreter intervention, 99 Spanish-speakers whose physicians only had access to usual interpreter services, and 100 English-speakers matched to Spanish-speaking participants on age, gender, and admission firm.
Patient satisfaction, hospital length of stay, number of inpatient consultations and radiology tests conducted in the hospital, adherence with follow-up appointments, use of emergency department (ED) services and hospitalizations in the 3 months after discharge, and the costs associated with provision of the intervention and any resulting change in health care utilization.
The enhanced interpreter service intervention did not significantly impact any of the measured outcomes or their associated costs. The cost of the enhanced interpreter service was $234 per Spanish-speaking intervention patient and represented 1.5% of the average hospital cost. Having a Spanish-speaking attending physician significantly increased Spanish-speaking patient satisfaction with physician, overall hospital experience, and reduced ED visits, thereby reducing costs by $92 per Spanish-speaking patient over the study period.
The enhanced interpreter service intervention did not significantly increase or decrease hospital costs. Physician-patient language concordance reduced return ED visit and costs. Health care providers need to examine all the cost implications of different language access services before they deem them too costly.
许多医疗服务提供者没有为英语水平有限的患者提供足够的语言服务,因为他们认为这些服务成本过高。然而,对于因未解决的语言障碍而可能承担的成本或提供语言服务的成本,人们知之甚少。
研究语言障碍和提供强化口译服务如何影响住院成本。
前瞻性干预研究。
公立医院内科住院服务。
323名成年住院患者:124名讲西班牙语的患者,其医生可获得强化口译干预;99名讲西班牙语的患者,其医生只能获得常规口译服务;100名讲英语的患者,在年龄、性别和入院科室方面与讲西班牙语的参与者匹配。
患者满意度、住院时间、在医院进行的住院会诊次数和放射检查次数、随访预约的依从性、出院后3个月内急诊服务的使用情况和住院情况,以及提供干预措施的成本和医疗保健利用方面的任何由此产生的变化。
强化口译服务干预对任何测量结果或其相关成本均无显著影响。强化口译服务的成本为每位讲西班牙语的干预患者234美元,占平均医院成本的1.5%。有一位讲西班牙语的主治医生显著提高了讲西班牙语患者对医生的满意度、总体医院体验,并减少了急诊就诊次数,从而在研究期间每位讲西班牙语的患者节省了92美元的成本。
强化口译服务干预并未显著增加或降低医院成本。医患语言一致性减少了急诊复诊次数和成本。医疗服务提供者在认为不同语言服务成本过高之前,需要审视其所有成本影响。