• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估用于预测未来事件的标志物的ROC性能。

Evaluating the ROC performance of markers for future events.

作者信息

Pepe Margaret S, Zheng Yingye, Jin Yuying, Huang Ying, Parikh Chirag R, Levy Wayne C

机构信息

Biostatistics and Biomathematics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., M2-B500, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

出版信息

Lifetime Data Anal. 2008 Mar;14(1):86-113. doi: 10.1007/s10985-007-9073-x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10985-007-9073-x
PMID:18064569
Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves play a central role in the evaluation of biomarkers and tests for disease diagnosis. Predictors for event time outcomes can also be evaluated with ROC curves, but the time lag between marker measurement and event time must be acknowledged. We discuss different definitions of time-dependent ROC curves in the context of real applications. Several approaches have been proposed for estimation. We contrast retrospective versus prospective methods in regards to assumptions and flexibility, including their capacities to incorporate censored data, competing risks and different sampling schemes. Applications to two datasets are presented.

摘要

受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线在生物标志物评估和疾病诊断测试中起着核心作用。事件时间结局的预测指标也可以用ROC曲线进行评估,但必须考虑标志物测量与事件时间之间的时间间隔。我们在实际应用的背景下讨论了时间依赖性ROC曲线的不同定义。已经提出了几种估计方法。我们在假设和灵活性方面对比了回顾性方法与前瞻性方法,包括它们纳入删失数据、竞争风险和不同抽样方案的能力。还给出了在两个数据集上的应用。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the ROC performance of markers for future events.评估用于预测未来事件的标志物的ROC性能。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2008 Mar;14(1):86-113. doi: 10.1007/s10985-007-9073-x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
2
Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications.医学研究中的时间依赖性ROC曲线分析:当前方法与应用
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 7;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0332-6.
3
Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks.用于具有竞争风险的删失事件时间的接收者操作特征曲线下时间依赖面积的估计与比较。
Stat Med. 2013 Dec 30;32(30):5381-97. doi: 10.1002/sim.5958. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
4
Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve estimator for correlated right-censored time-to-event data.用于相关右删失事件发生时间数据的时间相依性受试者工作特征曲线估计器
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Jan;33(1):162-181. doi: 10.1177/09622802231220496. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
5
Nonparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves conditional on a continuous covariate.基于连续协变量的时间依赖型ROC曲线的非参数估计。
Stat Med. 2016 Mar 30;35(7):1090-102. doi: 10.1002/sim.6769. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
6
Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic-based evaluation for survival outcomes.基于非参数接收器操作特征的生存结局评估。
Stat Med. 2012 Oct 15;31(23):2660-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.5386.
7
Smooth time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve estimators.平滑的时间依赖型接收器操作特性曲线估计器。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):651-674. doi: 10.1177/0962280217740786. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
8
Standardized and weighted time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the intrinsic prognostic capacities of a marker by taking into account confounding factors.标准化和加权时依接收器操作特性曲线,通过考虑混杂因素来评估标志物的内在预后能力。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):3397-3410. doi: 10.1177/0962280217702416. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Mixtures of receiver operating characteristic curves.受试者工作特征曲线的混合。
Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul;20(7):831-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 3.
10
Receiver operating characteristic curve estimation for time to event with semicompeting risks and interval censoring.具有半竞争风险和区间删失的事件发生时间的接收者操作特征曲线估计
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Dec;25(6):2750-2766. doi: 10.1177/0962280214531691. Epub 2014 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Performance of the RECODe Equation with the Addition of Polygenic Risk Scores for Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Individuals with Type II Diabetes.在2型糖尿病患者中,添加多基因风险评分对不良心血管结局评估的RECODe方程性能评价。
medRxiv. 2023 May 5:2023.05.03.23289457. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.03.23289457.
2
Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data.利用癌症基因组图谱数据评估多形性胶质母细胞瘤生物标志物的预后准确性
Cancer Inform. 2017 Dec 13;16:1176935117734844. doi: 10.1177/1176935117734844. eCollection 2017.
3
Fitting and Cross-Validating Cox Models to Censored Big Data With Missing Values Using Extensions of Partial Least Squares Regression Models.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective accuracy for longitudinal markers.纵向标记物的前瞻性准确性。
Biometrics. 2007 Jun;63(2):332-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00726.x.
2
Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.风险预测中受试者工作特征曲线的应用与误用
Circulation. 2007 Feb 20;115(7):928-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402.
3
Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death.用于预测首次重大心血管事件和死亡的多种生物标志物。
使用偏最小二乘回归模型的扩展方法对带有缺失值的删失大数据进行Cox模型拟合和交叉验证
Front Big Data. 2021 Nov 1;4:684794. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.684794. eCollection 2021.
4
Normalized emphysema scores on low dose CT: Validation as an imaging biomarker for mortality.低剂量CT上的标准化肺气肿评分:作为死亡率成像生物标志物的验证
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0188902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188902. eCollection 2017.
5
Boosting the discriminatory power of sparse survival models via optimization of the concordance index and stability selection.通过优化一致性指数和稳定性选择提高稀疏生存模型的判别能力。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Jul 22;17:288. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1149-8.
6
Evaluating a 4-marker signature of aggressive prostate cancer using time-dependent AUC.使用时间依赖的曲线下面积评估侵袭性前列腺癌的四标志物特征。
Prostate. 2015 Dec;75(16):1926-33. doi: 10.1002/pros.23090. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
7
Boosting the concordance index for survival data--a unified framework to derive and evaluate biomarker combinations.提高生存数据的一致性指数——一种用于推导和评估生物标志物组合的统一框架。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 6;9(1):e84483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084483. eCollection 2014.
8
Chapter 12: systematic review of prognostic tests.第十二章:预后检测的系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S94-101. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1899-y.
9
Evaluating prognostic accuracy of biomarkers under competing risk.评估竞争风险下生物标志物的预后准确性。
Biometrics. 2012 Jun;68(2):388-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01671.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
10
Maternal markers for detecting early-onset neonatal infection and chorioamnionitis in cases of premature rupture of membranes at or after 34 weeks of gestation: a two-center prospective study.胎膜早破 34 周及以后早产孕妇检测早发型新生儿感染和绒毛膜羊膜炎的母体标志物:一项两中心前瞻性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Apr 7;11:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-26.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2631-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055373.
4
Application of the time-dependent ROC curves for prognostic accuracy with multiple biomarkers.将时间依赖性ROC曲线应用于多种生物标志物的预后准确性评估。
Biometrics. 2006 Mar;62(1):279-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00441.x.
5
The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure.西雅图心力衰竭模型:心力衰竭患者生存率的预测
Circulation. 2006 Mar 21;113(11):1424-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584102. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
6
A time-dependent discrimination index for survival data.生存数据的时间依赖性判别指数。
Stat Med. 2005 Dec 30;24(24):3927-44. doi: 10.1002/sim.2427.
7
Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction.用于长期风险预测的ROC曲线下随时间变化面积的估计。
Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3474-86. doi: 10.1002/sim.2299.
8
The sensitivity and specificity of markers for event times.事件发生时间标志物的敏感性和特异性。
Biostatistics. 2006 Apr;7(2):182-97. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxi047. Epub 2005 Aug 3.
9
Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.生存模型预测准确性和ROC曲线。
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):92-105. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030814.x.
10
Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data.纵向标记数据的时间依赖性ROC曲线的半参数估计。
Biostatistics. 2004 Oct;5(4):615-32. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh013.