Landman Anne, Cortese Daniel K, Glantz Stanton
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Feb;66(4):970-81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.007.
The multinational tobacco companies responded to arguments about the social costs of smoking and hazards of secondhand smoke by quietly implementing the Social Costs/Social Values project (1979-1989), which relied upon the knowledge and authoritative power of social scientists to construct an alternate cultural repertoire of smoking. Social scientists created and disseminated non-health based, pro-tobacco arguments without fully acknowledging their relationship with the industry. After the US Surgeon General concluded that nicotine was addictive in 1988, the industry responded by forming "Associates for Research in the Science of Enjoyment" (c.1988-1999), whose members toured the world promoting the health benefits of the use of legal substances, including tobacco, for stress relief and relaxation, without acknowledging the industry's role. In this paper we draw on previously secret tobacco industry documents, now available on the Internet to show how both of these programs utilized academic sociologists, political scientists, anthropologists, psychologists, philosophers and economists, and allowed the industry to develop and widely disseminate friendly research through credible channels. Strategies included creating favorable surveys and opinions, infusing them into the lay press and media through press releases, articles and conferences, publishing, promoting and disseminating books, commissioning and placing favorable book reviews, providing media training for book authors and organizing media tours. These programs allowed the tobacco industry to affect public and academic discourse on the social acceptability of smoking.
跨国烟草公司对有关吸烟的社会成本和二手烟危害的论点做出回应,悄悄实施了“社会成本/社会价值”项目(1979 - 1989年),该项目依靠社会科学家的知识和权威力量构建了一套关于吸烟的另类文化说辞。社会科学家们创造并传播了基于非健康因素的支持烟草的论点,却未充分承认他们与烟草行业的关系。1988年美国卫生局局长得出尼古丁具有成瘾性的结论后,烟草行业成立了“享受科学研究协会”(约1988 - 1999年),其成员周游世界,宣扬使用包括烟草在内的合法物质对缓解压力和放松身心的健康益处,却不承认行业在其中所起的作用。在本文中,我们利用现已在互联网上公开的此前保密的烟草行业文件,来展示这两个项目是如何利用学术社会学家、政治学家、人类学家、心理学家、哲学家和经济学家的,以及如何让烟草行业通过可靠渠道开展并广泛传播有利的研究。策略包括开展有利的调查并形成观点,通过新闻稿、文章和会议将其渗透到大众媒体中,出版、推广和发行书籍,委托撰写并安排有利的书评,为书籍作者提供媒体培训以及组织媒体访问。这些项目使烟草行业能够影响公众和学术界关于吸烟社会可接受性的讨论。