• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

事件的自然顺序:不同语言使用者如何通过非语言方式呈现事件。

The natural order of events: how speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally.

作者信息

Goldin-Meadow Susan, So Wing Chee, Ozyürek Asli, Mylander Carolyn

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5730 South Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 8;105(27):9163-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710060105. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0710060105
PMID:18599445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2453738/
Abstract

To test whether the language we speak influences our behavior even when we are not speaking, we asked speakers of four languages differing in their predominant word orders (English, Turkish, Spanish, and Chinese) to perform two nonverbal tasks: a communicative task (describing an event by using gesture without speech) and a noncommunicative task (reconstructing an event with pictures). We found that the word orders speakers used in their everyday speech did not influence their nonverbal behavior. Surprisingly, speakers of all four languages used the same order and on both nonverbal tasks. This order, actor-patient-act, is analogous to the subject-object-verb pattern found in many languages of the world and, importantly, in newly developing gestural languages. The findings provide evidence for a natural order that we impose on events when describing and reconstructing them nonverbally and exploit when constructing language anew.

摘要

为了测试即使我们不说话时,我们所说的语言是否会影响我们的行为,我们让说四种主要语序不同的语言(英语、土耳其语、西班牙语和中文)的人执行两项非语言任务:一项交流任务(用手势描述一个事件而不说话)和一项非交流任务(用图片重构一个事件)。我们发现,说话者在日常言语中使用的语序并没有影响他们的非语言行为。令人惊讶的是,所有四种语言的使用者在两项非语言任务中都使用了相同的顺序。这种顺序,即施事-受事-动作,类似于世界上许多语言中发现的主语-宾语-动词模式,重要的是,在新发展的手势语言中也是如此。这些发现为一种自然顺序提供了证据,即当我们以非语言方式描述和重构事件时,我们会将这种顺序强加于事件之上,并且在重新构建语言时加以利用。

相似文献

1
The natural order of events: how speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally.事件的自然顺序:不同语言使用者如何通过非语言方式呈现事件。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 8;105(27):9163-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710060105. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
2
Cross-linguistic gestures reflect typological universals: a subject-initial, verb-final bias in speakers of diverse languages.跨语言手势反映了类型学上的普遍性:不同语言使用者中存在主语在前、动词在后的倾向。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.022. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
3
Does language shape silent gesture?语言会塑造无声的手势吗?
Cognition. 2016 Mar;148:10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
4
When Gestures Do or Do Not Follow Language-Specific Patterns of Motion Expression in Speech: Evidence from Chinese, English and Turkish.当手势与语言特定的运动表达方式一致或不一致时:来自汉语、英语和土耳其语的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2023 Apr;47(4):e13261. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13261.
5
Blind Speakers Show Language-Specific Patterns in Co-Speech Gesture but Not Silent Gesture.盲人说话者在伴随言语的手势中表现出特定语言模式,但在无声手势中则不然。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;42(3):1001-1014. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12502. Epub 2017 May 8.
6
Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: motion events in English and Turkish.言语和手势中跨语言变异的发展:英语和土耳其语中的运动事件
Dev Psychol. 2008 Jul;44(4):1040-54. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1040.
7
Is Seeing Gesture Necessary to Gesture Like a Native Speaker?看手势对像母语者一样做手势有必要吗?
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):737-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797616629931. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
8
Speaking and gesturing guide event perception during message conceptualization: Evidence from eye movements.言语和手势引导信息概念化过程中的事件感知:来自眼动的证据。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105127. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105127. Epub 2022 May 23.
9
The Effects of Iconicity and Conventionalization on Word Order Preferences.象似性和约定俗成性对语序偏好的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Oct;46(10):e13203. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13203.
10
Comprehension and production of gesture in combination with speech in one-word speakers.单语者在言语交流中对手势的理解与运用。
J Child Lang. 1992 Oct;19(3):559-80. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900011569.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamicity Predicts Inferred Temporal Order in Complex Sentences: Evidence from English, German, and Polish.动态性预测复杂句子中的推断时间顺序:来自英语、德语和波兰语的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2025 Feb;49(2):e70038. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70038.
2
Grammatical structures of emoji in Japanese-language text conversations.日语文本对话中表情符号的语法结构。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jul 29;9(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00571-9.
3
Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought.语言主要是一种交流工具,而不是思维工具。
Nature. 2024 Jun;630(8017):575-586. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07522-w. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
A universal preference for animate agents in hominids.人类对有生命主体的普遍偏好。
iScience. 2024 May 16;27(6):109996. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109996. eCollection 2024 Jun 21.
5
Adjective position and referential efficiency in American Sign Language: Effects of adjective semantics, sign type and age of sign exposure.美国手语中形容词位置与指称效率:形容词语义、手语类型及手语接触年龄的影响
J Mem Lang. 2022 Oct;126. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2022.104348. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
Surprisal From Language Models Can Predict ERPs in Processing Predicate-Argument Structures Only if Enriched by an Agent Preference Principle.只有通过主体偏好原则进行强化,语言模型的意外值才能预测谓词-论元结构处理过程中的事件相关电位。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Apr 1;5(1):167-200. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00121. eCollection 2024.
7
The evolutionary dynamics of how languages signal who does what to whom.语言如何向他人传达做什么事以及对谁做的信号,其进化动态。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 27;14(1):7259. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51542-5.
8
The Agent Preference in Visual Event Apprehension.视觉事件感知中的主体偏好
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Jun 9;7:240-282. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00083. eCollection 2023.
9
The Effects of Iconicity and Conventionalization on Word Order Preferences.象似性和约定俗成性对语序偏好的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Oct;46(10):e13203. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13203.
10
Revisiting the relation between syntax, action, and left BA44.重新审视句法、动作与左脑BA44区之间的关系。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 23;16:923022. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.923022. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left.沃尔夫假说在右视野得到支持,但在左视野则不然。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):489-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509868103. Epub 2005 Dec 30.
2
The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language.语法的出现:新语言中的系统结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 15;102(7):2661-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405448102. Epub 2005 Feb 7.
3
Children creating core properties of language: evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua.儿童创造语言的核心属性:来自尼加拉瓜一种新兴手语的证据。
Science. 2004 Sep 17;305(5691):1779-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1100199.
4
Is there a natural order for expressing semantic relations?表达语义关系是否存在自然顺序?
Cogn Psychol. 2002 Nov;45(3):375-412. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00502-9.
5
Shake, rattle, 'n' roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition.摇摆、晃动与滚动:语言和认知中运动的表征
Cognition. 2002 Jun;84(2):189-219. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00046-x.
6
Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures.两种文化中失聪儿童创造的自发符号系统。
Nature. 1998 Jan 15;391(6664):279-81. doi: 10.1038/34646.
7
Silence is liberating: removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual modality.沉默具有解放作用:解除了手动方式下语法表达的束缚。
Psychol Rev. 1996 Jan;103(1):34-55. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.34.
8
Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development.聋儿的手势交流:父母输入对早期语言发展的影响及非影响因素
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1984;49(3-4):1-151.
9
The development of language-like communication without a language model.
Science. 1977 Jul 22;197(4301):401-3. doi: 10.1126/science.877567.