• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁推动了差异?身份信号、外群体差异和文化品味的摒弃。

Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes.

作者信息

Berger Jonah, Heath Chip

机构信息

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6340, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):593-607. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.593.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.593
PMID:18729697
Abstract

People often diverge from members of other social groups: They select cultural tastes (e.g., possessions, attitudes, or behaviors) that distinguish them from outsiders and abandon tastes when outsiders adopt them. But while divergence is pervasive, most research on the propagation of culture is based on conformity. Consequently, it is less useful in explaining why people might abandon tastes when others adopt them. The 7 studies described in this article showed that people diverge to avoid signaling undesired identities. A field study, for example, found that undergraduates stopped wearing a particular wristband when members of the "geeky" academically focused dormitory next door started wearing them. Consistent with an identity-signaling perspective, the studies further showed that people often diverge from dissimilar outgroups to avoid the costs of misidentification. Implications for social influence, identity signaling, and the popularity and diffusion of culture are discussed.

摘要

人们常常与其他社会群体的成员产生差异

他们选择那些能将自己与外人区分开来的文化品味(如财产、态度或行为),而当外人采用这些品味时,他们就会摒弃。然而,尽管差异普遍存在,但大多数关于文化传播的研究都是基于从众行为。因此,在解释人们为何会在他人采用某些品味时摒弃它们方面,其作用较小。本文所描述的7项研究表明,人们产生差异是为了避免传递不受欢迎的身份信号。例如,一项实地研究发现,当隔壁以学术为重点的“书呆子”宿舍的成员开始佩戴某款特定腕带时,大学生们就不再佩戴了。与身份信号视角一致,这些研究进一步表明,人们常常与不同的外群体产生差异,以避免被错误识别的代价。文中还讨论了其对社会影响、身份信号以及文化的流行和传播的影响。

相似文献

1
Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes.谁推动了差异?身份信号、外群体差异和文化品味的摒弃。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):593-607. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.593.
2
The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.“我们”的另一面:当外群体成员表达共同身份时。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1613-26. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323600. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
3
Antecedents and consequences of social identity complexity: intergroup contact, distinctiveness threat, and outgroup attitudes.社会认同复杂性的前因与后果:群体间接触、独特性威胁及外群体态度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Aug;35(8):1085-98. doi: 10.1177/0146167209337037. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
4
Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity.群体中的个性与社会影响:群体认同的归纳与演绎路径
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Nov;89(5):747-63. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747.
5
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.
6
Choosing to enter or avoid diagnostic social situations.选择进入或回避诊断性社交场合。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep;20(9):1175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02420.x. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
7
Negational categorization and intergroup behavior.否定性分类与群体间行为。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):793-806. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315457. Epub 2008 Apr 7.
8
Forming implicit and explicit attitudes toward individuals: social group association cues.形成对个体的隐性和显性态度:社会群体关联线索。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):792-807. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.792.
9
How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes.采用速度如何影响文化品味的摒弃。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 19;106(20):8146-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812647106. Epub 2009 May 4.
10
Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact.想象中的互动能产生积极的认知吗?通过模拟社交接触减少偏见。
Am Psychol. 2009 May-Jun;64(4):231-40. doi: 10.1037/a0014718.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of willingness to eat wild mushrooms: extended theory of reasoned action.食用野生蘑菇意愿的预测因素:扩展的理性行动理论
Front Nutr. 2025 May 20;12:1553392. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1553392. eCollection 2025.
2
The evolution of similarity-biased social learning.相似性偏向社会学习的演变
Evol Hum Sci. 2025 Jan 20;7:e4. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.46. eCollection 2025.
3
Developing teachers' competency for inclusive education in Ethiopia.提升埃塞俄比亚教师开展全纳教育的能力。
Afr J Disabil. 2024 Dec 20;13:1383. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1383. eCollection 2024.
4
Breaking down the laughter: an exploration into the linguistic dimensions in stand-up comedy ratings.打破笑声:探索单口喜剧评级中的语言维度。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 20;12(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02187-6.
5
Decoding the Dynamics of Cultural Change: A Cultural Evolution Approach to the Psychology of Acculturation.解码文化变迁的动态过程:一种文化进化视角下的文化适应心理学研究方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2025 May;29(2):111-144. doi: 10.1177/10888683241258406. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
6
Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization: Insights and Implications for Climate Change.政治两极分化的社会心理学视角:对气候变化的见解与启示
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Jan;20(1):115-141. doi: 10.1177/17456916231186409. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
7
Coupled dynamics of behaviour and disease contagion among antagonistic groups.敌对群体中行为与疾病传播的耦合动力学
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Mar 18;3:e28. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.22. eCollection 2021.
8
Hashtags as signals of political identity: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter.标签作为政治身份的信号:#BlackLivesMatter(黑人的命也是命)和#AllLivesMatter(所有人的命都是命)。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286524. eCollection 2023.
9
Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy.社会规范解释了气候政策的优先次序。
Clim Change. 2022;173(1-2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03396-x. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
10
Reviewers' Identity Cues in Online Product Reviews and Consumers' Purchase Intention.在线产品评论中的评论者身份线索与消费者的购买意愿
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 25;12:784173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784173. eCollection 2021.