• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过全校范围的积极行为干预与支持来改变学校氛围:一项群组随机有效性试验的结果

Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial.

作者信息

Bradshaw Catherine P, Koth Christine W, Thornton Leslie A, Leaf Philip J

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Center for Prevention of Youth Violence, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2009 Jun;10(2):100-15. doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0114-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-008-0114-9
PMID:19011963
Abstract

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a universal, school-wide prevention strategy that is currently implemented in over 7,500 schools to reduce disruptive behavior problems. The present study examines the impact of PBIS on staff reports of school organizational health using data from a group-randomized controlled effectiveness trial of PBIS conducted in 37 elementary schools. Longitudinal multilevel analyses on data from 2,596 staff revealed a significant effect of PBIS on the schools' overall organizational health, resource influence, staff affiliation, and academic emphasis over the 5-year trial; the effects on collegial leadership and institutional integrity were significant when implementation fidelity was included in the model. Trained schools that adopted PBIS the fastest tended to have higher levels of organizational health at baseline, but the later-implementing schools tended to experience the greatest improvements in organizational health after implementing PBIS. This study indicated that changes in school organizational health are important consequences of the PBIS whole-school prevention model, and may in turn be a potential contextual mediator of the effect of PBIS on student performance.

摘要

积极行为干预与支持(PBIS)是一项全校范围的通用预防策略,目前有超过7500所学校在实施该策略,以减少破坏性行为问题。本研究利用在37所小学进行的PBIS群组随机对照有效性试验的数据,考察了PBIS对教职工报告的学校组织健康状况的影响。对来自2596名教职工的数据进行的纵向多层次分析显示,在为期5年的试验中,PBIS对学校的整体组织健康、资源影响力、教职工归属感和学术重点有显著影响;当模型中纳入实施保真度时,对同事领导能力和机构诚信的影响显著。采用PBIS最快的学校在基线时往往具有较高的组织健康水平,但实施较晚的学校在实施PBIS后组织健康状况改善最大。本研究表明,学校组织健康状况的变化是PBIS全校预防模式的重要结果,反过来可能是PBIS对学生成绩影响的潜在情境中介因素。

相似文献

1
Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial.通过全校范围的积极行为干预与支持来改变学校氛围:一项群组随机有效性试验的结果
Prev Sci. 2009 Jun;10(2):100-15. doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0114-9.
2
A state-wide quasi-experimental effectiveness study of the scale-up of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.全州范围内广泛实施正向行为干预和支持的准实验有效性研究。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Apr;73:41-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
3
Restorative Practices: Using local evidence on costs and student outcomes to inform school district decisions about behavioral interventions.恢复性实践:利用关于成本和学生成果的本地证据为学区做出有关行为干预的决策提供信息。
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Jun;92:188-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
4
Examining the association between implementation and outcomes : state-wide scale-up of school-wide positive behavior intervention and supports.考察实施与结果之间的关联:全州范围内学校全面积极行为干预与支持的推广
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;39(4):417-33. doi: 10.1007/s11414-012-9290-2.
5
A randomized controlled trial on the interconnected systems framework for school mental health and PBIS: Focus on proximal variables and school discipline.一项关于学校心理健康与积极行为干预支持系统(PBIS)互联系统框架的随机对照试验:关注近端变量与学校纪律
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Oct;94:49-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
6
Positive behavior support in school - a quasi-experimental mixed methods study and a randomized controlled trial.学校中的积极行为支持——一项准实验性混合方法研究和一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 1;12(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02021-z.
7
Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of a bundle of implementation support strategies to improve the fidelity of implementation of schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in rural schools.一项整群随机试验的研究方案,该试验采用一系列实施支持策略,以提高农村学校全校性积极行为干预与支持计划的实施保真度。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Jun 9;28:100949. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100949. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Study protocol: cluster randomized trial of consultation strategies for the sustainment of mental health interventions in under-resourced urban schools: rationale, design, and methods.研究方案:资源匮乏城市学校心理健康干预维持的咨询策略的整群随机试验:基本原理、设计和方法。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Feb 7;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00733-8.
9
Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports and fidelity of implementation on problem behavior in high schools.全校范围的积极行为干预与支持及其实施保真度对高中问题行为的影响。
Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Jun;29(2):111-124. doi: 10.1037/spq0000039. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
10
Adoption of PBIS within school districts.在学区内采用 PBIS。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Oct;76:159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Pupils' aggressive behaviour towards teachers: identifying protective factors at organizational level examined in a follow-up study.学生对教师的攻击性行为:在一项随访研究中探究组织层面的保护因素
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 13;13(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02564-9.
2
Training and Technical Assistance Increase the Fidelity of Implementation of a Universal Prevention Initiative in Rural Schools: Results from a 3-Year Cluster-Randomized Trial.培训与技术援助提高了农村学校普遍预防倡议实施的保真度:一项为期三年的整群随机试验结果
Prev Sci. 2025 Jan;26(1):56-68. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01776-0. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3
Core Components and Implementation Determinants of Multilevel Service Delivery Frameworks Across Child Mental Health Service Settings.

本文引用的文献

1
Maximizing the Implementation Quality of Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions in Schools: A Conceptual Framework.最大化学校中基于证据的预防性干预措施的实施质量:一个概念框架。
Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2008 Jul;1(3):6-28. doi: 10.1080/1754730x.2008.9715730.
2
Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.实施至关重要:关于实施对项目成果的影响以及影响实施的因素的研究综述。
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
3
Staff- and school-level predictors of school organizational health: a multilevel analysis.
多水平服务传递框架的核心组成部分和实施决定因素:跨越儿童心理健康服务环境。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Mar;51(2):172-195. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01320-8. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
4
How students' writing motivation, teachers' personal and professional attributes, and writing instruction impact student writing achievement: a two-level hierarchical linear modeling study.学生的写作动机、教师的个人及专业特质以及写作教学如何影响学生的写作成绩:一项两级分层线性建模研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1213929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213929. eCollection 2023.
5
Violence directed against teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A social-ecological analysis of safety and well-being.针对 COVID-19 大流行期间教师的暴力行为:安全与健康的社会生态学分析。
Sch Psychol. 2024 Sep;39(5):510-519. doi: 10.1037/spq0000562. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
6
Effects of trauma-informed approaches in schools: A systematic review.学校中创伤知情方法的效果:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 17;15(1-2):e1018. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1018. eCollection 2019 Jun.
7
The Effects of School Climate, Parent-Child Closeness, and Peer Relations on the Problematic Internet Use of Chinese Adolescents: Testing the Mediating Role of Self-Esteem and Depression.学校氛围、亲子亲密关系和同伴关系对中国青少年网络问题使用的影响:自尊和抑郁的中介作用检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7583. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137583.
8
The Correlation between Organizational (School) Climate and Teacher Job Satisfaction-The Type of Educational Institution Moderating Role.组织(学校)氛围与教师工作满意度的相关性——教育机构类型的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11):6520. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116520.
9
School Climate and Bullying Bystander Responses in Middle and High School.中小学的学校氛围与欺凌旁观者反应
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;80. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101412. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
10
School-wide positive behavior support in six special schools of South Korea: processes and outcomes across years.韩国六所特殊学校的全校性积极行为支持:多年来的过程与成果
Int J Dev Disabil. 2019 Oct 9;65(5):337-346. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2019.1647729.
学校组织健康的员工和学校层面预测因素:一项多层次分析。
J Sch Health. 2007 Aug;77(6):294-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00210.x.
4
Organizational Culture and Climate and Mental Health Provider Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practice.组织文化与氛围以及心理健康服务提供者对循证实践的态度
Psychol Serv. 2006 Feb;3(1):61-72. doi: 10.1037/1541-1559.3.1.61.
5
A focused approach to assessing program fidelity.一种评估项目保真度的针对性方法。
Prev Sci. 2007 Mar;8(1):25-34. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0051-4. Epub 2006 Sep 13.
6
Why aren't effective teaching tools widely adopted?为什么有效的教学工具没有被广泛采用?
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;25(1):21-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-21.
7
School predictors of the intensity of implementation of school-based prevention programs: results from a national study.学校预防项目实施强度的学校预测因素:一项全国性研究的结果
Prev Sci. 2006 Jun;7(2):225-37. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0029-2.
8
A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.实施保真度研究综述:对学校环境中药物滥用预防的启示
Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):237-56. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.237.
9
The organizational context of children's mental health services.儿童心理健康服务的组织背景。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2002 Dec;5(4):233-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1020972906177.
10
Statistical power in randomized intervention studies with noncompliance.存在不依从情况的随机干预研究中的统计效能
Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):178-93. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.178.