Leiper John B, Watson Phil, Evans Gethin, Dvorak Jiri
School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
J Sports Sci. 2008 Dec;26 Suppl 3:S71-9. doi: 10.1080/02640410802526924.
Heart rate was measured in 79 young male soccer players during training in the third week of Ramadan. Forty-eight players were practising Ramadan fasting, while the other 31 players were eating normally. All participants trained for 60-80 min at an ambient temperature of 25-28 degrees C and relative humidity of 50-53%. Heart rate, which was measured throughout the training session, was marginally higher in the fasting (mean 144 beats . min(-1), s = 25) than in the non-fasting (139 beats . min(-1), s = 23) group (P < 0.001). When assessed as the percentage of heart rate reserve utilized, however, the training load was similar for both groups (62%, s = 8). No difference was detected in training intensity for the fasting and non-fasting groups when quantified by either training impulse (253, s = 139 and 253, s = 108, respectively) or training load indicator (222, s = 123 and 179, s = 49, respectively). The overall subjective rating of perceived exertion of the training session reported 20 min after finishing training was similar for the fasting (12, range 6-17) and non-fasting (12, range 7-17) groups, which was comparable (P = 0.16) to the mean value for the entire week (13, range 8-16). A similar finding was observed in the players' subjective appraisal of the difficulty of training of the individual session and for the whole week's training. Overall exercise load measures indicated that there was no biologically significant difference between the fasting and non-fasting groups during training in the third week of Ramadan.
在斋月第三周的训练期间,对79名年轻男性足球运动员的心率进行了测量。48名运动员进行斋月禁食,而另外31名运动员正常饮食。所有参与者在环境温度25 - 28摄氏度、相对湿度50 - 53%的条件下训练60 - 80分钟。在整个训练过程中测量的心率,禁食组(平均144次/分钟,标准差 = 25)略高于非禁食组(139次/分钟,标准差 = 23)(P < 0.001)。然而,当以心率储备利用率的百分比来评估时,两组的训练负荷相似(62%,标准差 = 8)。当通过训练冲量(分别为253,标准差 = 139和253,标准差 = 108)或训练负荷指标(分别为222,标准差 = 123和179,标准差 = 49)进行量化时,禁食组和非禁食组的训练强度没有差异。训练结束20分钟后报告的训练主观用力程度总体评分,禁食组(12,范围6 - 17)和非禁食组(12,范围7 - 17)相似,与整周的平均值(13,范围8 - 16)相当(P = 0.16)。在运动员对单次训练和整周训练难度的主观评价中也观察到了类似的结果。总体运动负荷测量表明,在斋月第三周的训练期间,禁食组和非禁食组之间没有生物学上的显著差异。