气球模拟风险任务（BART）的重测特性。
Test-retest characteristics of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).
作者信息
White Tara L, Lejuez C W, de Wit Harriet
机构信息
Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Community Health, Box G-S121-4, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
出版信息
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Dec;16(6):565-70. doi: 10.1037/a0014083.
Abstract
The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) is a computerized decision-making task that provides a test of behavioral risk taking. The task is increasingly used in laboratory settings and in the field with young adults and adolescents. However, there are currently no published data about the test-retest characteristics of the task when it is administered on separate days. The current paper addresses this gap. Risky behavior on the BART (adjusted average pumps) showed acceptable test-retest reliability across days (r = +.77, p < .001). The data indicate that risk behavior on the BART has adequate test-retest stability and therefore performance on the task on a single occasion is likely to be representative of an individual's performance on other occasions.
摘要
气球模拟风险任务（BART）是一项计算机化决策任务，用于测试行为风险承担能力。该任务越来越多地应用于实验室环境以及针对年轻人和青少年的实地研究中。然而，目前尚无关于该任务在不同日期进行重测时的重测特征的已发表数据。本文填补了这一空白。BART上的风险行为（调整后的平均打气次数）在不同日期显示出可接受的重测信度（r = +.77，p <.001）。数据表明，BART上的风险行为具有足够的重测稳定性，因此单次任务表现可能代表个体在其他场合的表现。
相似文献
1
Test-retest characteristics of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).气球模拟风险任务（BART）的重测特性。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Dec;16(6):565-70. doi: 10.1037/a0014083.
2
Test-retest reliability of brain responses to risk-taking during the balloon analogue risk task.在气球模拟风险任务中，冒险行为的大脑反应的重测信度。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 1;209:116495. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116495. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
3
Test-Retest Reliability of Common Behavioral Decision Making Tasks.常见行为决策任务的重测信度
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Feb 1;33(1):125-129. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx038.
4
Relationship between virtual reality balloon analogue risk task and risky decision-making.虚拟现实气球模拟风险任务与冒险决策之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0282097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282097. eCollection 2023.
5
The assessment of risky decision making: a factor analysis of performance on the Iowa Gambling Task, Balloon Analogue Risk Task, and Columbia Card Task.风险决策评估：对爱荷华赌博任务、气球模拟风险任务和哥伦比亚卡片任务表现的因素分析。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):777-85. doi: 10.1037/a0038622. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
6
The Implicit Sexual Risk Assessment: A Pilot Study of a Novel Behavioral Task.内隐性行为风险评估：一项新型行为任务的初步研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):2921-2929. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02092-8. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
7
A new look at risk-taking: using a translational approach to examine risk-taking behavior on the balloon analogue risk task.对冒险行为的新审视：采用转化方法研究气球模拟风险任务中的冒险行为。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Oct;22(5):444-52. doi: 10.1037/a0037421. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
8
Is all risk bad? Young adult cigarette smokers fail to take adaptive risk in a laboratory decision-making test.所有风险都是坏的吗？青少年烟民在实验室决策测试中无法承担适应性风险。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Jun;215(4):801-11. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2182-y. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
9
The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers.气球模拟风险任务（BART）能够区分吸烟者和非吸烟者。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Feb;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.11.1.26.
10
Risk taking differences on a behavioral task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking.作为潜在奖励/损失幅度以及冲动性和冒险倾向个体差异的函数，在一项行为任务中的冒险差异。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009 Sep;93(3):258-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.10.023. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
引用本文的文献
1
Review: Suicide and its relationship to aggression and impulsivity.综述：自杀及其与攻击性和冲动性的关系。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01321-0.
2
Association of Risk-Taking Behaviors, Vestibular Provocation and Action Boundary Perception Following Sport-Related Concussion in Adolescents.青少年运动相关脑震荡后冒险行为、前庭刺激与动作边界感知的关联
Brain Sci. 2025 Feb 22;15(3):229. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030229.
3
The impact of shift work on paramedics and their practice: Protocol for a simulated paramedic shift work study.轮班工作对护理人员及其工作的影响：一项模拟护理人员轮班工作研究的方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0319569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319569. eCollection 2025.
4
Social and non-social risk-taking in adolescence.青少年时期的社交与非社交冒险行为。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90050-y.
5
Convergent Validity of Experimental Cognitive Tests in a Large Community Sample.大型社区样本中实验性认知测试的收敛效度
Assessment. 2024 Nov 10;32(7):10731911241283410. doi: 10.1177/10731911241283410.
6
Background uncertainty does not increase risk aversion in decision making.背景不确定性不会增加决策中的风险规避。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):25899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73650-y.
7
Assessing Children's Autonomic Nervous System Activity During Structured Tasks: A Feasibility and Reliability Study in Ghana.评估儿童在结构化任务期间的自主神经系统活动：加纳的一项可行性和可靠性研究。
Dev Psychobiol. 2024 Sep;66(6):e22535. doi: 10.1002/dev.22535.
8
Potential association between suicide risk, aggression, impulsivity, and the somatosensory system.自杀风险、攻击性、冲动性与躯体感觉系统之间的潜在关联。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Jul 2;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae041.
9
Links between socioeconomic position and cognitive and behavioral regulation in adolescence: The role of pubertal development.青少年时期社会经济地位与认知和行为调节之间的联系：青春期发育的作用。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Dec;34(4):1232-1246. doi: 10.1111/jora.12964. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
10
Impulsivity is a stable, measurable, and predictive psychological trait.冲动性是一种稳定、可测量且可预测的心理特征。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 11;121(24):e2321758121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321758121. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
本文引用的文献
1
Bupropion improves attention but does not affect impulsive behavior in healthy young adults.安非他酮可提高健康年轻成年人的注意力，但不影响其冲动行为。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;16(2):113-23. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.2.113.
2
Mechanisms underlying heightened risk taking in adolescents as compared with adults.与成年人相比，青少年冒险行为增加背后的机制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):272-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.272.
3
Effects of low to moderate acute doses of pramipexole on impulsivity and cognition in healthy volunteers.低至中等急性剂量的普拉克索对健康志愿者冲动性和认知的影响。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Feb;28(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181602fab.
4
Personality and gender differences in effects of d-amphetamine on risk taking.右旋苯丙胺对冒险行为影响中的人格与性别差异
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Dec;15(6):599-609. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.6.599.
5
An examination of the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, 11th version in a sample of Chinese adolescents.对中文版第11版巴雷特冲动性量表在中国青少年样本中的心理测量特性进行的一项研究。
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Jun;104(3 Pt 2):1169-82. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.4.1169-1182.
6
Smaller feedback ERN amplitudes during the BART are associated with a greater family history density of alcohol problems in treatment-naïve alcoholics.在行为成瘾风险任务（BART）期间，较小的反馈错误相关负波（ERN）振幅与初治酒精成瘾者中更高的酒精问题家族史密度相关。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jan 1;92(1-3):141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.07.017. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
7
A task to manipulate attentional load, set-shifting, and inhibitory control: convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the Parametric Go/No-Go Test.一项用于操纵注意力负荷、转换任务和抑制控制的任务：参数化Go/No-Go测试的聚合效度和重测信度
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007 Nov;29(8):842-53. doi: 10.1080/13803390601147611. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
8
Reliability and validity of the instrument used in BRFSS to assess physical activity.行为危险因素监测系统（BRFSS）中用于评估身体活动的工具的信度和效度。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1267-74. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180618bbe.
9
Effects of sleep deprivation and morningness-eveningness traits on risk-taking.睡眠剥夺和晨型-夜型特质对冒险行为的影响。
Psychol Rep. 2007 Apr;100(2):613-26. doi: 10.2466/pr0.100.2.613-626.
10
The reliability of the Adolescent Sedentary Activity Questionnaire (ASAQ).青少年久坐活动问卷（ASAQ）的可靠性。
Prev Med. 2007 Jul;45(1):71-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.014. Epub 2007 Apr 14.
Zotero 插件