Eby Lillian T, Allen Tammy D, Evans Sarah C, Ng Thomas, Dubois David
University of Georgia.
J Vocat Behav. 2008 Apr;72(2):254-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005.
The study of mentoring has generally been conducted within disciplinary silos with a specific type of mentoring relationship as a focus. The purpose of this article is to quantitatively review the three major areas of mentoring research (youth, academic, workplace) to determine the overall effect size associated with mentoring outcomes for protégés. We also explored whether the relationship between mentoring and protégé outcomes varied by the type of mentoring relationship (youth, academic, workplace). Results demonstrate that mentoring is associated with a wide range of favorable behavioral, attitudinal, health-related, relational, motivational, and career outcomes, although the effect size is generally small. Some differences were also found across type of mentoring. Generally, larger effect sizes were detected for academic and workplace mentoring compared to youth mentoring. Implications for future research, theory, and applied practice are provided.
指导研究通常是在学科孤立的环境中进行的,以特定类型的指导关系为重点。本文的目的是对指导研究的三个主要领域(青少年、学术、职场)进行定量综述,以确定与被指导者的指导结果相关的总体效应量。我们还探讨了指导与被指导者结果之间的关系是否因指导关系类型(青少年、学术、职场)而异。结果表明,指导与广泛的积极行为、态度、健康相关、人际关系、动机和职业结果相关,尽管效应量通常较小。在不同类型的指导中也发现了一些差异。一般来说,与青少年指导相比,学术和职场指导的效应量更大。本文还提供了对未来研究、理论和应用实践的启示。