Department of Mathematics, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 2009;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S74-80. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20476.
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) continue to gain in popularity. To utilize the wealth of data created more effectively, a variety of methods have recently been proposed to include a priori information (e.g., biologically interpretable sets of genes, candidate gene information, or gene expression) in GWAS analysis. Six contributions to Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 Group 11 applied novel or recently proposed methods to GWAS of rheumatoid arthritis and heart disease related phenotypes. The results of these analyses were a variety of novel candidate genes and sets of genes, in addition to the validation of well-known genotype-phenotype associations. However, because many methods are relatively new, they would benefit from further methodological research to ensure that they maintain type I error rates while increasing power to find additional associations. When methods have been adapted from other study types (e.g., gene expression data analysis or linkage analysis), the lessons learned there should be used to guide implementation of techniques. Lastly, many open research questions exist concerning the logistic details of the origin of the a priori information and the way to incorporate it. Overall, our group has demonstrated a strong potential for identifying novel genotype-phenotype relationships by including a priori data in the analysis of GWAS, while also uncovering a series of questions requiring further research.
全基因组关联研究(GWAS)继续受到欢迎。为了更有效地利用所产生的大量数据,最近提出了各种方法,将先验信息(例如,具有生物学可解释性的基因集、候选基因信息或基因表达)纳入 GWAS 分析中。遗传分析研讨会 16 组 11 的六项贡献应用了新的或最近提出的方法来进行类风湿关节炎和心脏病相关表型的 GWAS。这些分析的结果除了验证众所周知的基因型-表型关联外,还包括了各种新的候选基因和基因集。然而,由于许多方法相对较新,因此需要进一步进行方法学研究,以确保它们在保持 I 型错误率的同时提高发现其他关联的能力。当方法从其他研究类型(例如,基因表达数据分析或连锁分析)中改编而来时,应从那里吸取经验教训来指导技术的实施。最后,关于先验信息的来源和纳入方式的逻辑细节存在许多悬而未决的研究问题。总的来说,我们小组通过在 GWAS 分析中纳入先验数据,展示了识别新的基因型-表型关系的强大潜力,同时也发现了一系列需要进一步研究的问题。