Marsh Anthony P, Miller Michael E, Rejeski W Jack, Hutton Stacy L, Kritchevsky Stephen B
Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109-7868, USA.
J Aging Phys Act. 2009 Oct;17(4):416-43. doi: 10.1123/japa.17.4.416.
It is unclear whether strength training (ST) or power training (PT) is the more effective intervention at improving muscle strength and power and physical function in older adults. The authors compared the effects of lower extremity PT with those of ST on muscle strength and power in 45 older adults (74.8 +/- 5.7 yr) with self-reported difficulty in common daily activities. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: PT, ST, or wait-list control. PT and ST trained 3 times/wk for 12 wk using knee-extension (KE) and leg-press (LP) machines at approximately 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM). For PT, the concentric phase of the KE and LP was completed "as fast as possible," whereas for ST the concentric phase was 2-3 s. Both PT and ST paused briefly at the midpoint of the movement and completed the eccentric phase of the movement in 2-3 s. PT and ST groups showed significant improvements in KE and LP 1RM compared with the control group. Maximum KE and LP power increased approximately twofold in PT compared with ST. At 12 wk, compared with control, maximum KE and LP power were significantly increased for the PT group but not for the ST group. In older adults with compromised function, PT leads to similar increases in strength and larger increases in power than ST.
目前尚不清楚力量训练(ST)或功率训练(PT)在改善老年人肌肉力量、功率和身体功能方面哪种干预措施更有效。作者比较了下肢PT与ST对45名自我报告在日常活动中存在困难的老年人(74.8±5.7岁)肌肉力量和功率的影响。参与者被随机分为3个治疗组之一:PT组、ST组或等待名单对照组。PT组和ST组每周训练3次,共12周,使用伸膝(KE)和腿举(LP)器械,负荷约为1次重复最大值(1RM)的70%。对于PT组,KE和LP的向心阶段要“尽可能快”地完成,而对于ST组,向心阶段为2 - 3秒。PT组和ST组在动作中点都短暂停顿,并在2 - 3秒内完成动作的离心阶段。与对照组相比,PT组和ST组的KE和LP的1RM均有显著改善。与ST组相比,PT组的最大KE和LP功率增加了约两倍。在12周时,与对照组相比,PT组的最大KE和LP功率显著增加,而ST组则没有。在功能受损的老年人中,PT比ST能带来相似的力量增加和更大的功率增加。