Suppr超能文献

开环、闭环和补偿控制:在节奏任务中应对压力时的性能提升。

Open-loop, closed-loop and compensatory control: performance improvement under pressure in a rhythmic task.

机构信息

Department of Sports Science, Technische Universität München, Connollystrasse 32, 80809, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;201(4):729-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2087-8. Epub 2009 Nov 27.

Abstract

According to explicit monitoring theories, the phenomenon of choking under pressure is due to actors focusing their attention on the execution of the skill. This step-by-step perceptually guided control may then interfere with automatic execution. In order to examine the changes in control at the sensorimotor level, we examined the rhythmic task of ball bouncing which affords detailed quantification of indicators of control based on previous research. The hypothesis was that under psychological pressure perceptually guided control should lead to decreased performance due to over-emphasis on closed-loop control and decreased compensatory control. In two experiments of different difficulty psychological stress was induced via setting up a fake competition. Results showed that, contrary to the hypothesis, performance accuracy and consistency improved together with an increase in compensatory control. Indicators for open- and closed-loop processes did not change. Only under more challenging conditions in Experiment 2, enhanced performance under pressure was accompanied by more active, closed-loop and less passive control. The results are discussed in light of task demands and the continuous rhythmic nature of the task: in more challenging tasks, control appears to be more prone to disturbance due to psychological stress. The different control demands in continuous rhythmic tasks may be less prone to interference due to psychological stress than in discrete tasks.

摘要

根据明确的监控理论,在压力下窒息的现象是由于演员将注意力集中在技能的执行上。这种逐步的感知引导控制可能会干扰自动执行。为了检验传感器运动水平上控制的变化,我们检查了球反弹的节奏任务,该任务根据先前的研究提供了基于控制的指标的详细量化。假设是在心理压力下,感知引导控制由于过度强调闭环控制和减少补偿控制,应该会导致性能下降。在两个不同难度的实验中,通过设置虚假竞争来产生心理压力。结果表明,与假设相反,随着补偿控制的增加,性能准确性和一致性都得到了提高。开环和闭环过程的指标没有变化。只有在实验 2 中更具挑战性的条件下,在压力下增强的性能伴随着更积极的闭环和更少的被动控制。结果根据任务需求和任务的连续节奏性质进行了讨论:在更具挑战性的任务中,由于心理压力,控制似乎更容易受到干扰。与离散任务相比,连续节奏任务的不同控制需求可能不太容易受到心理压力的干扰。

相似文献

1
Open-loop, closed-loop and compensatory control: performance improvement under pressure in a rhythmic task.
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;201(4):729-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2087-8. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
2
Optimal control of a hybrid rhythmic-discrete task: the bouncing ball revisited.
J Neurophysiol. 2010 May;103(5):2482-93. doi: 10.1152/jn.00600.2009. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
3
Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: expertise differences, choking, and slumps.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2004 Mar;10(1):42-54. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.10.1.42.
4
The Effect of Haptic Guidance on Learning a Hybrid Rhythmic-Discrete Motor Task.
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2015 Apr-Jun;8(2):222-34. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2014.2375173. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
5
Implicit guidance to stable performance in a rhythmic perceptual-motor skill.
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jun;233(6):1783-99. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4251-7. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
6
Limiting motor skill knowledge via incidental training protects against choking under pressure.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):279-290. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1486-x.
7
Choking under pressure: multiple routes to skill failure.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):390-406. doi: 10.1037/a0023466.
10
Stability and variability: indicators for passive stability and active control in a rhythmic task.
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jun;99(6):3027-41. doi: 10.1152/jn.01367.2007. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

2
Optimizing Cancer Treatment Using Game Theory: A Review.
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):96-103. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3395.
3
Implicit guidance to stable performance in a rhythmic perceptual-motor skill.
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jun;233(6):1783-99. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4251-7. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
4
The effect of stereotype threat on performance of a rhythmic motor skill.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Apr;41(2):525-41. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000039. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
5
Optimal control of a hybrid rhythmic-discrete task: the bouncing ball revisited.
J Neurophysiol. 2010 May;103(5):2482-93. doi: 10.1152/jn.00600.2009. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1997 Sep;23(9):937-944. doi: 10.1177/0146167297239003.
2
A computational model for rhythmic and discrete movements in uni- and bimanual coordination.
Neural Comput. 2009 May;21(5):1335-70. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.03-08-720.
3
Variability in motor learning: relocating, channeling and reducing noise.
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;193(1):69-83. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1596-1. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
4
Robotics and neuroscience: a rhythmic interaction.
Neural Netw. 2008 May;21(4):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.005. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
5
Stability and variability: indicators for passive stability and active control in a rhythmic task.
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jun;99(6):3027-41. doi: 10.1152/jn.01367.2007. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
6
Control of bimanual rhythmic movements: trading efficiency for robustness depending on the context.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 May;187(2):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1297-9. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
7
Passive stability and active control in a rhythmic task.
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Nov;98(5):2633-46. doi: 10.1152/jn.00742.2007. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
10
On rhythmic and discrete movements: reflections, definitions and implications for motor control.
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;181(1):13-30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0899-y. Epub 2007 May 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验