Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):595-607. doi: 10.1037/a0017312.
Few studies have examined whether nicotine dependence self-report questionnaires can predict specific behaviors and symptoms at specific points in time. The present study used data from a randomized clinical trial (N = 608; M. E. Piper et al., 2007) to assess the construct validity of scales and items from 3 nicotine dependence measures: the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (T. F. Heatherton, L. T. Kozlowski, R. C. Frecker & K.-O. Fagerström, 1991), the Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale (S. Shiffman, A. J. Waters, & M. Hickcox, 2004), and the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (M. E. Piper et al., 2004). Scales from these measures were used to predict participants' reports on real-time measures of withdrawal symptoms and smoking behavior and retrospective self-report questionnaires to assess convergent and discriminative validity. The nicotine dependence measures' scales and items generally predicted the real-time measures of similar constructs, but the percent of variance accounted for was low. The nicotine dependence measures did, however, show evidence of discriminative validity. Thus, this study provides modest support for the construct validity of these nicotine dependence scales.
很少有研究检验尼古丁依赖自评问卷是否能预测特定时间点的特定行为和症状。本研究使用了一项随机临床试验的数据(N = 608;M. E. Piper 等人,2007),评估了 3 种尼古丁依赖测量工具的量表和项目的建构效度:尼古丁依赖检验量表(T. F. Heatherton、L. T. Kozlowski、R. C. Frecker 和 K.-O. Fagerström,1991)、尼古丁依赖综合征量表(S. Shiffman、A. J. Waters 和 M. Hickcox,2004)以及威斯康星吸烟依赖动机量表(M. E. Piper 等人,2004)。这些工具的量表被用于预测参与者对实时戒断症状和吸烟行为的报告,以及对回溯性自我报告问卷进行的聚合和区分效度评估。尼古丁依赖测量工具的量表和项目通常能预测实时测量的类似结构,但解释的方差百分比较低。尼古丁依赖测量工具确实表现出区分效度的证据。因此,本研究为这些尼古丁依赖量表的建构效度提供了适度的支持。