Departament of Optics, University of Valencia, 46100, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;248(3):395-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1258-4. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
To determine the impact of pupil size in the psychometric determination of intraocular straylight determined by the compensation comparison method in a population of young healthy adults.
Straylight was measured in 21 eyes from 11 young healthy subjects using the C-Quant (Oculus, Germany). Subjects were dilated with Phenylephrine 5%, and varying pupil size was simulated using three different diaphragms of 3, 5 and 6 mm in diameter. Three measurements were taken with each of the apertures in a randomized sequence. Mixed effects and repeated measures ANOVA was applied to test the significance of differences in straylight values for the fixed pupil diameters. Correlation analysis was applied to test relationships between the measurements for each fixed pupil diameter, and Bland-Altmann plots displayed the distribution of differences.
Significant differences between the straylight values obtained for the different fixed pupil diameters were not found. Correlation analysis did not show relationships between the values obtained for different diameters either (p > 0.05 in all cases). Bland-Altmann plots show that average differences are around zero regardless of the actual value measured, but there is also a substantial individual variation, with differences going as far up as 0.5 Log(s) units in some cases.
In healthy human eyes, straylight values measured with the Van den Berg straylightmeter are not affected significantly by the subject's pupil size, although individual variations exist implying that no control for pupil size is required when estimating average amounts of retinal straylight from samples of eyes, but is desirable for the assessment of longitudinal variations of straylight in individual subjects, especially when assessing effects of surgical procedures and/or lens designs.
确定瞳孔大小对补偿比较法测定年轻健康成年人眼内杂散光的心理测量学的影响。
使用 C-Quant(德国欧科路公司)对 11 名年轻健康受试者的 21 只眼进行了杂散光测量。受试者用 5%苯肾上腺素散瞳,并使用直径为 3、5 和 6 毫米的三个不同光阑模拟不同的瞳孔大小。每个孔径以随机顺序进行三次测量。混合效应和重复测量方差分析用于检验固定瞳孔直径的杂散光值差异的显著性。相关性分析用于检验每个固定瞳孔直径的测量值之间的关系,Bland-Altman 图显示了差异的分布。
不同固定瞳孔直径下获得的杂散光值之间没有发现显著差异。相关性分析也没有显示不同直径下获得的值之间存在关系(在所有情况下 p > 0.05)。Bland-Altman 图显示,无论实际测量值如何,平均差异都接近零,但也存在很大的个体差异,在某些情况下差异高达 0.5 Log(s)单位。
在健康人眼中,用范登伯格杂散光仪测量的杂散光值不受受试者瞳孔大小的显著影响,尽管存在个体差异,这意味着在从样本眼睛估计视网膜杂散光的平均量时不需要控制瞳孔大小,但对于评估个体受试者的杂散光纵向变化是可取的,特别是在评估手术程序和/或镜片设计的影响时。