Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Manoa, HI, USA.
Int J Behav Med. 2010 Jun;17(2):108-17. doi: 10.1007/s12529-010-9080-2.
The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20) consists of 20 items designed to assess four aspects of pain-related anxiety: cognitive anxiety, escape-avoidance behaviors, fear of pain, and physiological symptoms of anxiety. Although the PASS-20 is a well-established measure of pain-related anxiety in Western samples, different cultures may yield a different factor structure or different associations with pain-related outcome variables.
The purposes of this study were (1) to examine the factor structure of a Korean language version of the PASS-20 (KPASS-20); (2) to examine reliability and construct validity of the KPASS-20; and (3) to compare the findings of this study with those of the original psychometric study using a Western sample.
A total of 166 patients seeking treatment in a university pain management center located in Seoul, Korea participated.
Results indicated that the KPASS-20 consists of three factors, "fearful thinking," "physiological response," and "avoidance," and has adequate reliability and construct validity estimates. On the mean total score of the KPASS-20, the Korean sample had a significantly higher score than the original Western sample. In addition, in correlation analyses between the total score of the KPASS-20, physical functioning, and pain severity, the Korean sample had significantly higher coefficients, whereas similar differences were not found in the analyses of psychological functioning and depression.
The findings provide preliminary support for the reliability and validity of the KPASS-20.
疼痛焦虑症状量表(PASS-20)由 20 个项目组成,旨在评估与疼痛相关的焦虑的四个方面:认知焦虑、逃避-回避行为、对疼痛的恐惧和焦虑的生理症状。尽管 PASS-20 是西方样本中评估与疼痛相关的焦虑的一种成熟的测量工具,但不同的文化可能会产生不同的因素结构或与与疼痛相关的结果变量的不同关联。
本研究的目的是:(1)检验 PASS-20 的韩语版本(KPASS-20)的因子结构;(2)检验 KPASS-20 的信度和构念效度;(3)将本研究的结果与使用西方样本进行的原始心理测量研究的结果进行比较。
共有 166 名在位于首尔的韩国某大学疼痛管理中心寻求治疗的患者参与了本研究。
结果表明,KPASS-20 由三个因素组成,分别是“恐惧思维”、“生理反应”和“回避”,具有足够的信度和构念效度估计。在 KPASS-20 的总分均值上,韩国样本的得分明显高于原始西方样本。此外,在 KPASS-20 的总分与身体功能和疼痛严重程度之间的相关分析中,韩国样本的相关系数显著较高,而在心理功能和抑郁的分析中则没有发现类似的差异。
这些发现为 KPASS-20 的可靠性和有效性提供了初步支持。