• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚、泰国和四个西方国家的吸烟规范和态度对戒烟意愿的影响:跨文化比较。

The effects of smoking norms and attitudes on quitting intentions in Malaysia, Thailand and four Western nations: a cross-cultural comparison.

机构信息

School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Victoria University, St Albans, Australia.

出版信息

Psychol Health. 2009 Jan;24(1):95-107. doi: 10.1080/08870440802385854.

DOI:10.1080/08870440802385854
PMID:20186642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4540368/
Abstract

This research investigated the influence of smoking attitudes and norms on quitting intentions in two predominantly collectivistic countries (Malaysia and Thailand) and four predominantly individualistic Western countries (Canada, USA, UK and Australia). Data from the International Tobacco Control Project (N = 13,062) revealed that higher odds of intending to quit were associated with negative personal attitudes in Thailand and the Western countries, but not in Malaysia; with norms against smoking from significant others in Malaysia and the Western countries, but not in Thailand; and with societal norms against smoking in all countries. Our findings indicate that normative factors are important determinants of intentions, but they play a different role in different cultural and/or tobacco control contexts. Interventions may be more effective if they are designed with these different patterns of social influence in mind.

摘要

本研究调查了吸烟态度和规范对两个主要集体主义国家(马来西亚和泰国)和四个主要个人主义西方国家(加拿大、美国、英国和澳大利亚)戒烟意愿的影响。国际烟草控制项目的数据(N=13062)显示,在泰国和西方国家,对个人吸烟态度越负面,戒烟意愿越高,而在马来西亚则并非如此;在马来西亚和西方国家,来自重要他人的反吸烟规范与戒烟意愿相关,但在泰国并非如此;在所有国家,社会对吸烟的规范都与戒烟意愿相关。我们的研究结果表明,规范因素是戒烟意愿的重要决定因素,但在不同的文化和/或烟草控制背景下,它们的作用不同。如果干预措施考虑到这些不同的社会影响模式,可能会更有效。

相似文献

1
The effects of smoking norms and attitudes on quitting intentions in Malaysia, Thailand and four Western nations: a cross-cultural comparison.马来西亚、泰国和四个西方国家的吸烟规范和态度对戒烟意愿的影响:跨文化比较。
Psychol Health. 2009 Jan;24(1):95-107. doi: 10.1080/08870440802385854.
2
Comparing the experience of regret and its predictors among smokers in four Asian countries: findings from the ITC surveys in Thailand, South Korea, Malaysia, and China.比较四个亚洲国家(泰国、韩国、马来西亚和中国)吸烟者的后悔经历及其预测因素:来自 ITC 调查的结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Oct;15(10):1663-72. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt032. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
3
Regret and rationalization among smokers in Thailand and Malaysia: findings from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia Survey.泰国和马来西亚吸烟者的后悔与合理化:国际烟草控制东南亚调查结果
Health Psychol. 2009 Jul;28(4):457-64. doi: 10.1037/a0014669.
4
Socio-economic variations in tobacco consumption, intention to quit and self-efficacy to quit among male smokers in Thailand and Malaysia: results from the International Tobacco Control-South-East Asia (ITC-SEA) survey.泰国和马来西亚男性吸烟者在烟草消费、戒烟意愿及戒烟自我效能方面的社会经济差异:国际烟草控制-东南亚(ITC-SEA)调查结果
Addiction. 2008 Mar;103(3):502-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02113.x.
5
Prevalence and attributes of roll-your-own smokers in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.国际烟草控制(ITC)四国调查中自卷烟吸烟者的患病率及特征
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii76-82. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013268.
6
Quitting-related beliefs, intentions, and motivations of older smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey.四个国家老年吸烟者与戒烟相关的信念、意图和动机:国际烟草控制政策评估调查结果
Addict Behav. 2005 May;30(4):777-88. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.08.023.
7
Does how you quit affect success? A comparison between abrupt and gradual methods using data from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Study.你戒烟的方式会影响成功率吗?利用国际烟草控制政策评估研究的数据对突然戒烟法和逐渐戒烟法进行比较。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Aug;9(8):801-10. doi: 10.1080/14622200701484961.
8
Secular versus religious norms against smoking: which is more important as a driver of quitting behaviour among Muslim Malaysian and Buddhist Thai smokers?世俗规范与宗教规范对吸烟的限制:在推动马来西亚穆斯林和泰国佛教徒烟民戒烟行为方面,哪个更重要?
Int J Behav Med. 2013 Jun;20(2):252-8. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9225-6.
9
Do risk-minimizing beliefs about smoking inhibit quitting? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four-Country Survey.关于吸烟的风险最小化信念是否会抑制戒烟?来自国际烟草控制(ITC)四国调查的结果。
Prev Med. 2009 Aug-Sep;49(2-3):219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.015. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
10
Adult smokers' perception of the role of religion and religious leadership on smoking and association with quitting: a comparison between Thai Buddhists and Malaysian Muslims.成年吸烟者对宗教及宗教领袖在吸烟与戒烟方面所起作用的认知:泰国佛教徒与马来西亚穆斯林的比较
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Oct;69(7):1025-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.042. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Social Norms for Cigarette Smoking and Nicotine Vaping Product Use Predict Trying Nicotine Vaping Products and Attempts to Quit Cigarette Smoking Amongst Adult Smokers? Findings From the 2016-2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys.吸烟和尼古丁电子烟产品使用的社会规范是否能预测成年吸烟者尝试尼古丁电子烟产品和尝试戒烟?来自 2016-2020 年国际烟草控制四国吸烟和电子烟调查的发现。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Feb 9;25(3):505-513. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac212.
2
Country and gender differences in the association between violence and cigarette smoking among youth.青少年中暴力与吸烟之间关联的国家和性别差异。
Confl Health. 2020 Dec 14;14(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00332-7.
3
Anti-smoking social norms are associated with increased cessation behaviours among lower and higher socioeconomic status smokers: A population-based cohort study.反吸烟社会规范与社会经济地位较低和较高的吸烟者戒烟行为增加有关:基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208950. eCollection 2018.
4
Functional beliefs and risk minimizing beliefs among Thai healthcare workers in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospital: its association with intention to quit tobacco and alcohol.泰国玛哈沙拉堪那空乍能玛哈叻医院医护人员的功能信念和风险最小化信念:与戒烟和戒酒意愿的关联。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 Jul 12;12(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0118-1.
5
Noticing cigarette health warnings and support for new health warnings among non-smokers in China: findings from the International Tobacco Control project (ITC) China survey.关注中国非吸烟者对香烟健康警示的认知及对新健康警示的支持:国际烟草控制项目(ITC)中国调查结果
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 19;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4397-2.
6
The Association of Exposure to Point-of-Sale Tobacco Marketing with Quit Attempt and Quit Success: Results from a Prospective Study of Smokers in the United States.接触售点烟草营销与戒烟尝试及戒烟成功的关联:美国吸烟者前瞻性研究的结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Feb 6;13(2):203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13020203.
7
The influence of societal individualism on a century of tobacco use: modelling the prevalence of smoking.社会个人主义对一个世纪烟草使用情况的影响:模拟吸烟流行率
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 22;15:1280. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2576-6.
8
Use of and attitudes toward tobacco and alcohol among adults in southern Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡南部成年人对烟草和酒精的使用情况及态度。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013 Sep;44(5):880-99.
9
Conceptual challenges in the translation of research into practice: it's not just a matter of "communication".将研究转化为实践中的概念性挑战:不仅仅是“沟通”的问题。
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Jun;1(2):256-69. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0035-1.
10
Associations between tobacco control policy awareness, social acceptability of smoking and smoking cessation. Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys.烟草控制政策认知、吸烟的社会可接受性与戒烟之间的关联。国际烟草控制(ITC)欧洲调查结果。
Health Educ Res. 2014 Feb;29(1):72-82. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt073. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-cultural generalizability of the theory of planned behavior among young people in a physical activity context.计划行为理论在体育活动背景下的年轻人中的跨文化普遍性。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Feb;29(1):2-20.
2
Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism.集体主义中的集体在哪里(是谁)?迈向个人主义和集体主义的概念澄清。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):133-51. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133.
3
Tobacco denormalization and industry beliefs among smokers from four countries.四个国家吸烟者对烟草去常态化的看法及行业观念
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Sep;31(3):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
4
Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.国际烟草控制(ITC)四国调查方法
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii12-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013870.
5
Normative processes and adolescents' smoking behaviour in Norway: a multilevel analysis.挪威的规范过程与青少年吸烟行为:一项多层次分析
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Apr;62(7):1810-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.029. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
6
Social influences on smoking cessation: a comparison of the effect of six social influence variables.社会因素对戒烟的影响:六个社会影响变量效果的比较
Prev Med. 2005 Jul;41(1):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.040. Epub 2004 Dec 9.
7
Constructing an integrated model of the antecedents of adolescent smoking.构建青少年吸烟成因的综合模型。
Br J Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;9(Pt 3):315-33. doi: 10.1348/1359107041557075.
8
Educational differences in the intention to stop smoking: explanations based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.戒烟意愿中的教育差异:基于计划行为理论的解释
Eur J Public Health. 2004 Jun;14(2):194-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.2.194.
9
Peers and adolescent smoking.同龄人与青少年吸烟
Addiction. 2003 May;98 Suppl 1:37-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.98.s1.4.x.
10
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.重新思考个人主义与集体主义:理论假设与元分析评估
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):3-72.