State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academyof Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jun;38(4):519-28. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.4.519.
The degree to which phonological codes constrain handwriting is at present controversial. Two experiments used a picture-word interference paradigm in which participants wrote down the names of pictures while attempting to ignore visual distractor words presented at various time intervals (SOAs). Distractors could be orthographically and phonologically related, orthographically related only, or unrelated. We found an exclusive effect of phonology at an early SOA, and orthographic priming at a later SOA. In a second experiment, we showed that the effect of phonology was diminished when writers engaged in concurrent articulatory suppression. The results suggest a role of phonology in the generation of handwritten words that is to some extent dependent on situational circumstances.
目前，语音代码对书写的限制程度存在争议。两个实验使用了图片-单词干扰范式，参与者在写下图片名称的同时，试图忽略在不同时间间隔（SOA）呈现的视觉干扰单词。干扰项可以是在拼写上和语音上相关的，仅在拼写上相关的，或者是不相关的。我们发现，在早期 SOA 时存在语音的排他性影响，而在后期 SOA 时存在拼写上的启动。在第二个实验中，我们表明，当书写者同时进行发音抑制时，语音的影响会减弱。结果表明，语音在手写单词的生成中起作用，在某种程度上取决于情境。
