Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital, Ospedali Riuniti di Trieste, Strada di fiume 447, Trieste 34149, Italy.
J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Dec;17(12):1537-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.031. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
In a prospective study we compared the surgical outcome, length of hospital stay, complications and patient satisfaction for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy (LM) under spinal anaesthesia (SA) in the sitting position (23 patients) to those of another cohort who underwent LM under general anaesthesia (GA) in the prone or genu-pectoral position during the same time period (238 patients). We aimed to determine: (i) if epidural anaesthesia is safe for lumbar microdiscectomy; and (ii) if placing the patient in a sitting position confers an advantage in performing the operation. For all patients we calculated the time from the end of the operation to the first spontaneous urination and to the first administration of analgesic drugs. Before being discharged, patients were asked to give an opinion on the quality of analgesia obtained by epidural anaesthesia and on the sitting position used. No patient had any complications linked to epidural anaesthesia and only one patient experienced a small dural tear as a surgical complication. Twenty of 23 patients expressed satisfaction with the level of analgesia obtained and only three considered it poor. All patients found the sitting position comfortable. Advantages of the sitting position for surgery include better comfort for the patient, potential to recreate a load condition similar to the one that takes place during orthostasis and a "cleaner" operative field that uses gravity to drain blood. Of greatest concern is the possibility of the patient developing a dural tear and subsequent leaking of cerebrospinal fluid, which could also be a source of surgical complications. Currently, epidural anaesthesia allows a reduction in anaesthetic and surgical times, anaesthetic complications and, consequently, hospitalization period. Further analysis of the sitting position for the patient during surgery is required to fully assess the advantages and disadvantages of this method.
在一项前瞻性研究中,我们比较了在相同时间段内接受椎管内麻醉(SA)下坐位腰椎显微切除术(LM)的 23 例患者与接受全身麻醉(GA)下俯卧位或膝胸位 LM 的另 238 例患者的手术结果、住院时间、并发症和患者满意度。我们旨在确定:(i)硬膜外麻醉是否安全用于腰椎显微切除术;(ii)将患者置于坐位是否有利于手术操作。对于所有患者,我们计算了从手术结束到第一次自主排尿和第一次使用镇痛药的时间。在出院前,患者被要求对硬膜外麻醉获得的镇痛质量和使用的坐位发表意见。没有患者出现与硬膜外麻醉相关的并发症,只有 1 例患者发生小的硬脑膜撕裂作为手术并发症。23 例患者中有 20 例对获得的镇痛水平表示满意,只有 3 例认为不满意。所有患者均认为坐位舒适。手术中坐位的优点包括患者舒适度更好、有可能重建类似于直立时发生的负荷状态以及“更清洁”的手术场利用重力排出血液。最令人担忧的是患者发生硬脑膜撕裂和随后的脑脊液漏的可能性,这也可能是手术并发症的来源。目前,硬膜外麻醉可减少麻醉和手术时间、麻醉并发症,从而缩短住院时间。需要进一步分析手术中患者的坐位,以充分评估这种方法的优缺点。