McKee C M, Gleadhill D N, Watson J D
Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Apr;40(333):150-3.
As a consequence of the 1989 National Health Service review health authorities are likely to take a greater interest in patterns of use of secondary care services by patients of different general practitioners. Use of accident and emergency departments has been shown to predict subsequent use of other hospital services. If meaningful comparisons are to be made between practices it is important to identify factors other than variation in clinical practice which influence attendance at accident and emergency departments. A one in 20 sample of patients attending an accident and emergency department was studied. Patients were aggregated by general practice and by electoral ward of residence, and the influence of a range of variables was examined using multiple regression. For both groups of patients distance from an accident and emergency department was an important factor in the rate of attendance. It was possible to examine the effect of several socioeconomic variables in the analysis by electoral ward: these were not associated significantly with attendance rates. Similarly, in the analysis by practice, mean list size per partner could not explain variation in attendance rates. This study supports others which have indicated that distance from an accident and emergency department must be taken into account when interpreting attendance rates.
由于1989年国民医疗服务体系审查的结果,卫生当局可能会对不同全科医生的患者使用二级医疗服务的模式产生更大兴趣。急诊部门的使用已被证明可以预测随后对其他医院服务的使用情况。如果要在不同医疗机构之间进行有意义的比较,识别出除临床实践差异之外影响急诊部门就诊率的因素就很重要。对在急诊部门就诊的患者进行了1/20的抽样研究。患者按全科医疗机构和居住的选区进行汇总,并使用多元回归分析一系列变量的影响。对于两组患者而言,距离急诊部门的远近都是就诊率的一个重要因素。在按选区进行的分析中,可以考察几个社会经济变量的影响:这些变量与就诊率没有显著关联。同样,在按医疗机构进行的分析中,每位医生的平均名单人数也无法解释就诊率的差异。这项研究支持了其他研究,这些研究表明在解释就诊率时必须考虑到距离急诊部门的远近。